She did the first time around.
2007-04-02 09:30:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by mikehunt29 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hillary Rodham Clinton was such a liability in the Clinton White House-that she was asked repeatedly to keep a low profile .( Fighting the VP for power -etc..turning off voters )..The Clintons had focus groups meet , to lay out rescue strategies because Hillary was such a liability in the White House . She couldn't even run health -care reform- and she wants to run the country ? She had to have a GROUP tell her how to act so the voters wouldn't know the real Hillary . Hair & looking demure is one thing - but what the public sees of Hillary Clinton is fabrication by experts . She was so far Left and demanded Bill Clinton govern that way - despite that he was elected as a centrist .We already know our national security was compromised in the Clinton administration that focused more on indictments ; illegal business dealings ; illegal campaign contributions from foreign sources - refusing capture of bin Laden , and the Clintons dismantled the military they hate - NOT GW Bush .
Just what we don't need in the Oval Office is someone whose focus is money ; dismantling our military ; risking national security and shredding classified documents . Just the tip of the iceberg .
2007-04-04 10:40:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honestly? You clearly know that Bush has done a ridiculously horrid job as our president. I'm even more disgusted that some of the citizens in this country voted* to re-elect him. I dont agree with everything Hilary Clinton stands for, but just as Mr. Kerry wasnt all that much of a catch, I've got to vote for the lesser of two evils.
Now, in the spirit of being honest. . . I dont think she has a snowball's chance in hell of actually winning. The U.S. is NOT going to accept a female president, and I'm sure most of them will be coming out of the woodworks to vote* and make sure that doesn't happen.
I'll agree with everyone else : A mailbox could do a better job than Bush.
*not taking into consideration that elections are rigged anyhow.
2007-04-02 09:52:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No Hillary can't do a worse job as President than George W. Bush.
Neither can:
Obama
Richardson
Dodd
Biden
Clark
Gore
Gravel
Edwards
Kucinich
Gingrich
Giuliani
Brownback
Tancredo
McCain
Romney
T.Thompson
Huckabee
Paul
F. Thompson
Hunter
Pitaki
Did I miss anyone? All would be better than the worst president in the history of the United States of America.
2007-04-02 09:57:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I know it's hard to imagine but the answer is YES! In my opinion Bush has been one of the most ineffectual presidents to ever hold office. He has helped destroy this countries global image and it's going to take a long time to recuperate. I don't think any of the forerunners in the next pres. election have got the character that it's going to take. They're all self serving politicians!
2007-04-02 09:34:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You people are really pretty stupid perpetuating representative government & the current corrupt structure! When Total rule & control needs to be in the hands of the legal citizen majority NOT the few wealthy minority! There will be no changes from the fleecing of America under Representative government or Republic of Fascist Capitalism! There are NOT two parties or more in our political structure there is only one "The money party" Which needs its butt kick out by the LCM "legal citizen majority" party! You will get nothing but deception conquer & divide under the current ruling wealthy class. You vote does NOT count for you have no means of proof thus NO democracy.
2007-04-02 10:20:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by bulabate 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
If she was a good women, she would donate the $400 Million Dollars she raise for this Campaign. Are you forgetting the Millions that her husband wasted on a lie. That us tax payers had to pay. Come on there are better people running! We need a fresh face and hopefully a honest person!
2007-04-02 09:36:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by beaner 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
You are filtering the news thru looney eyes.
Hillary can do a lot worse.
Bush took us out of the the great clintoon resession.
He took the war with terrorism to the land of terrorist.
She will undo all of that at a much higher cost to all of us.
Can you say recession? Can you say taxes? Can you say your prayers pointing to the east at 5 pm everyday?
Can you say hile to your thighness?
Are you nuts?
2007-04-02 09:33:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by kabarker 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course she could, and if elected, almost certainly will. The Bush tax cuts have added trillions to the economy, and increased (!) Federal revenues over the past five years by over $1,000,000,000,000.
2007-04-02 09:31:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary is a neo-con. Has lunch with the bush family and rupert murdoch (fox news) who support her as the next evil president to drive america into the pits of hell!
2007-04-02 09:30:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by jeb black 5
·
0⤊
1⤋