Who here QUESTIONS the EVENTS and their justifications/explanations prior to, during and after 9/11/01?

Question

Im just curious because I question them myself.
for instance; how is it possible for both towers 1 and 2 (the two which Im focused on at this point) to just pancake down, like a deck of cards. Since the impacts came only from one side respectively, i would expect that the "intense heat" be relatively contained.Thus, only the structural support colums on one side would soften enough to collapse.Thus, the building, from the impact up, would theoreticaly topple towards the side of impact in one or a few massive chucks.
That is takeing into account the fact that the main supports had some kind of fire resistant substance on them, as is supposed; and that most of the jet fuel Probably burned out side of the building, since the inside of the building was Probably suffocated of Oxygen(jetfuel needs a high oxygen ratio in order to burn as a gas, which it was). Plus the idea that paper caused 1000F temps is crazy! Pulverized cement iduno?! where are the gigantic central columns??

Do you believe what the government( Bush administration) says?

If you believe it was an inside job, how do we seek justice? Can justice even be obtained? Can the TRUTH be obtained?

Answer 1

Anyone who DOESN'T question them is a brainwashed idiot who places too much trust in a government that has continually mislead the American people since the era of FDR. America NEEDS war to keep its economy going. We've known that since WWII when the U.S entered for 'ideological' purposes and, by sheer good luck just happened to come out of it as the most powerful nation in the world. The Cold War (I won't even go into the Vietnam fiasco, enough has been said) could have ended YEARS before it did but people like Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon kept it going because it allowed for a constant demand for WEAPONS= billions of dollars in industrial production. And when it finally ended what did America go and do? IRAQ! Another ideological war. I'm sure it had nothing to do with OIL and keeping the weapons industry going. Yep.

So, how convenient that 9/11 should provide the perfect stepping stones for a mass U.S occupation of the Middle East (Iran is an inevitability at this stage).

Those are just my thoughts on the matter. Hope someone was enlightened by them.

Answer 2

Its two big planes crashing into a building. A huge commercial jet smashed into a building. Are you a scientist? Are you an engineer? Ask a certified engeneer or scientist and they will tell you it is possible and probable that that happened. Are you a scientist? No, just someone who has been warped into a false pretense that our government would be stupid to do this?

Oh and as for the bombs going off or whatever crap they make up. Yeah if you think that a huge plane can't throw down a building, let me remind you the towers fell from the top to the bottom. Bombs didn't go off at the bottom of the building and then tower down. How stupid are you to believe that? Come on seriously? You think a bomb can destroy the building rather than two huge planes? You're pathetic.

To quote what a previous person said "A whistle blower leaked the blueprints of the world trade center structures. Those buildings were built to withstand aircraft. "
Well guess what, the titanic wasn't supposed to sink. Big suprise there!

Answer 3

Always question but the facts presented line up with the official story. A high rise is 90% air. The main supports were in the center of the building. The planes entered one side and completed destroyed multiple floors. The towers did lean to one side when they began their fall. When 20 plus floors fall onto a single floor there is no resistance, hence the free-fall appearance.

I know, I know. The buildings were wired with expolsives and remote detonators on the floors below where the planes hit. And those pilots of the jets counted accurately to hit at the spot they needed to as to not destroy any wiring and detonators or explosives that had been carefully planted. After an hour or so of jet fuel and interior of building burning someone made the key decision to "blow" the buildings (one at a time) all so we could invade Iraq 19 months in the future (with a little side show in Afghanistan first).

Your choice

Answer 4

where are your references??the only thing i question is the lack of our intel. services not being able to catch up to the entire plan put forth. they should have been able to stop this before it happened soon after the 1993 bombing. who was in office then. as for during the attack, did you see the two different angles that the planes hit at or not? first plane hit square and that's why that tower stood a little longer. second plane turned to side when it hit. the fuel from second plan ran right down the building as it burned from explosion. so did the first but not as quick. also remember that both, yes both planes had been fueled to the max. for long flights standard. the two towers also were shaken violently from the initial hit. as for building seven, just ask anyone who was actually there in the area how much vibration was involved when the two towers went down! couple that with extreme heat and debris fallout, down it went also. if you look close at the video of the towers going down you will see that they both did start to lean to one side but as the weight compounded the floors just pancaked like dominoes. as for after, all i can say is that we have not been hit again,(yet) so someone is doing something right.

Answer 5

Anyone with a single shred of common sense and intelligence knows that all of the "conspiracy theories" concerning the WTC and the 9/11 attacks are nothing but hogwash, distorted facts, and outright lies.

May I suggest that you do some serious reading on the topic and start with the 9/11 Commission's Report?

Then you may want to go to the Discovery Channel web site and see when you can catch a rebroadcast of their program which explained in scientific, factual detail on just why the Towers collapsed, and why it was NOT anything but what the government says it was - and, by the way, which is what we saw with our own eyes.

Answer 6

Did the sign in your neighborhood that says "Slow Children" apply to you? Let's see...You all say Bush and his government are stupid. You don't understand anything about metallurgy or construction. You follow the conspiracy theorists like sheep. The reason is too make money, but they can't and haven't. Since the load bearing is on the center of the building, when it gives way, it gives way in the center. Oh, yeah, sorry you and the others don't really care for truth and facts.....then again everyone loves a good conspiracy theory.

Answer 7

listen here the buildings had planned obsolecence built in so in 100 years they could be taken down withing budget and within the foot print. People melted steel in clay pot ovens using would as a fuel. Cars melt in car fires, Steal Ships melt in sea fires!

Answer 8

A whistle blower leaked the blueprints of the world trade center structures. Those buildings were built to withstand aircraft.

Answer 9

Read it here: http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

"The collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers on September 11, 2001, was as sudden as it was dramatic; the complete destruction of such massive buildings shocked nearly everyone. Immediately afterward and even today, there is widespread speculation that the buildings were structurally deficient, that the steel columns melted, or that the fire suppression equipment failed to operate. In order to separate the fact from the fiction, we have attempted to quantify various details of the collapse. "


too much info for me to cut and paste.

Answer 10

CONSPIRACY NANCY ALERT....

Troll you need serious professional mental help.....you r SPEW only makes people laugh at your ignorance....

Even Danny Bonaduci is able to figure it out that it was terrorists...

AND HE IS A FOOL...guess that makes you lower on the evolutionary scale of intelligence