English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read these sniveling posters talk about how the so-called terrorists kill innocent people,

Excuse me for stating the following but didn't the United States drop A-Bombs upon women and children; Wow! What a monsterous image! Wholesale mega death of innocent women and children!

2007-04-02 08:56:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Stop rationalizing, baby killers, mega death, we did it like no one else has!

2007-04-02 09:06:13 · update #1

You justiy when the stain is upon you, but condem another for lesser act?
Do I see HYPOCRITE!

2007-04-02 09:09:29 · update #2

10 answers

That's true, but the only other option would be to invade the Japanese mainland. In that scenario, more would have died, the war would have likely gone to urban scenarios, with situations of us dropping standard ordinance bombs on the cities, which would still kill innocents. There was no way to win WW2 against the Japanese without innocent people dying.

In the island hopping campaign to reach Japan, many Japanese villagers were killing themselves; their government's propaganda machine told them Americans would enslave them (not true...). Surely, they'd be committing suicide in the cities too.

2007-04-02 09:01:21 · answer #1 · answered by Pfo 7 · 3 0

No doubt developing Fatman and Littleboy ended World War II and shortened it by probably 5-10 years and saved maybe a million or more lives. That said it opened up a Pandora's box.
Truman (a democrat) was the one who signed the order to drop both bombs..

Also Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Hussein killed more of their own people with impunity then we could ever hope to.
Hitler slayed an estimate 6-11 million people, Stalin's purges claimed 20-50 million people, Pol Pot is estimated to have killed a couple a million as did Hussein against Iran and his own people.

So-Called terrorists, hmmm I wander where you've heard that colloquilism? hhmmmm? Perhaps the democrapic underground?

1st you dolts on the left seem bent on one thing, the destruction western culture. What you fail to realize is you dolts would be the 1st to have your throats slit if muslims ever invaded. Also, by failing to address Radical Islamists there could well come a time when a nuke will go off in your town or city.

Your crowd treat most problems with the ostrich treatment, stick your head in the sand in hopes they go away..

You submit to Islam or suffer the consequences, it is already happening in Eurabia.

Islam in it's self is innocuous as are most religions. In the teachings of the Koran as professed is that Sharia is the law they adhere too, Sharia law is a 8th century remnant that goes against societal norms. The "fanatical islamo-fascists" bent on world destruction believe that through Jihad the Messiah will come. Well, that said, people are people, I think a person can believe what they wish as long as their belief does not inhibit my ability to believe what I choose.

Islam has three tenants for dealing with non-muslims, Convert to islam, tax and enslave, or kill. While the majority of muslims don't feel this doctrine is valid, the islamo-fascists that are soon to enplace Sharia in Europe with have countless infidels to deal with..

I would recommend some reading before you give islam a pass, read Robert Spencer's book "The Political Incorrect Guide to Islam" and also see if you can get a copy of the DVD "Obsession" which is a very good documentary of radical islam and a must see for anyone who questions why some muslims are creating a very dangerous situation for this planet.

I've known people of all faiths, from Jew, Muslim, Christian Buddhist, Hindu, Wiccan, and each one have the view that their religion is the "only" correct one and "if only" people would see what they see the world would be a better place..

Here is a link to a must read article that is a glimpse of the future regarding Islam. It is a must read.. it's long but well worth the time.


http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/2...

What baffles me is that the supposed "peaceful" muslims and their clerics don't condemn these radicals for fear of reprisal, guess what by denying a problem exists won't make it go away. Muslim radicals killed 3000+ people in NYC and DC on 9/11/01, in my opinion the was is not on Terror, we need to call it what it is, you can't fight an ideology, you need to fight an enemy, radicals are the enemy, the direction their clerics preach is a global sharia under a new Caliphate (muslim pope)..

Do a google on Sharia, you will find many of the same things as you'd find in the Old testament book of Leviticus, while these "laws" were fine and dandy 2000 years ago, the social implications are not valid today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurabia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhimmitude
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Islamic_Tolerance

Hmmm,

Hypocrisy? Wow.. Just heard that one.

I am not justifying war, I'd prefer the middle east would implode. That said, I don't want them setting one foot on our soil and touching the head of anyone even a sorry arsed lib who runs at the mouth.

2007-04-02 16:14:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

targeting women and children is terrorism Cowards that build bases and industry have to expect innocents will suffer. The US Saved millions by dropping the Bomb. Less people died in Hiroshima than in Dresden and the Tokyo bombings. you have the speech and manners of a fool.

2007-04-02 16:05:51 · answer #3 · answered by THOR! 1 · 3 1

Build arms between hospitals and orphanages then whine about collateral damage.
Pull your head out.

2007-04-02 16:07:21 · answer #4 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 1 0

It sounds like justification for what the terrorist are doing. Muslims love death.

2007-04-02 16:11:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

are you a MORON....last time I checked when the TERRORISTS flew the planes into a building we weren't at war....and the Nukes were dropped DURING A WORLD WAR...slight difference...PS the Japs had trained the women and children to commit suicide if we invaded..so it SAVED LIVES...now do your homework there little child you m\might really LEARN something...

2007-04-02 16:05:09 · answer #6 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 3 1

Just wait a few years. As soon as Iran gets the bomb you will see some real baby killing, they have already announced where they will drop the first one.

2007-04-02 16:01:54 · answer #7 · answered by hironymus 7 · 4 2

Very well answered "Slim Whi"..... Let's hope and pray that fools like the one who asked this question, might be educated by your answer.

2007-04-02 16:33:36 · answer #8 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 1 0

War is hell.

However, Nagasaki and Hiroshima were targeted because they were industrial centers paramount to the Jap. war effort.

2007-04-02 16:00:28 · answer #9 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 5 0

and what kind of hero are you to go hide behind babies.

2007-04-02 18:02:10 · answer #10 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers