Not current life. Signs of life in the past. There are indications that Mars had free-flowing water at some time in the distant past. If there was free-flowing water, then it may have been warm enough and wet enough for life to have evolved (if only bacterial life).
2007-04-02 07:32:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its as good as any other place, we think Venus and Mecury are too hot and have deadly gases so we look to Mars. Which is probably a waste of time. I love the Star Trek series but that is all science fiction. Just because we can dream does not make it happen all the time.
2007-04-02 08:32:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There were two really.
First, it was reported that a meteorite from Mars possibly contained fossilised life forms - see link 1.
Secondly, the possibility that Mars actually has quite an amount of water (albeit frozen) - see link 2.
2007-04-02 07:29:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by the_lipsiot 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ice caps indicating water. Mean temperatures are not as extreme as other inner planets. Some features show evidence of (geologically) recent water flow.
2007-04-03 15:51:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by kwilfort 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When a space craft came back from mars, there were shocking pictures of water. Since depends on water, this might mean there is life on mars.
2007-04-02 09:12:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by karateking12 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
sufficient solar radiation
an atmosphere
evidence that at least at one time there was water
near by (making exploration easier than, say, some planet circling Alpha Centauri)
2007-04-02 07:27:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by dogsafire 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it is round.
2007-04-02 07:25:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋