Were you bigger or smaller during the second pregnancy? Was the second labor longer or shorter than the first? Did the second baby weigh more or less?
2007-04-02 07:04:57 · 10 answers · asked by guardianangel 3 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
I was a little bit bigger then second time. Second labor was a little bit shorter and the baby weighed more.
1st baby - 7 lbs 13 oz
2nd baby - 8 lbs 7 oz
BUT
3rd baby - 9 lbs 12 oz
With the third, I was smaller, labor was longer (b/c I was induced) and definently she outweighed both of her brothers!!!!
2007-04-02 07:09:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Each pregnancy is different. I was about the same size during my second prenancy. I'm a small person anyway though. My second labor was shorter. By the time I got to the hospital my son was born in 15 minutes. My second baby was smaller than my first baby. One-5pds 15 oz
Two- 5pds 13 oz Third- 5 pds 8 oz. I hope this helps.
2007-04-02 07:11:50 · answer #2 · answered by Babygirl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i was smaller with my second pregancy also smaller with my third but a lil bigger but smaller with my fourth than i was the second and third. my labor was longer with the second but was shorter with the third and the fourth i had c-section, my second weighed less than the first but the third weighed more than the second but weighed the same as the first and my fourth was smaller than the other three. so it just goes to say that every pregancy is differnt and not every baby is going to be born the same. it also goes to say that it just depends how healthy you are and how good you take care of toyr self during pragancy and to make sure that you see a doctor every month.
2007-04-02 07:12:23 · answer #3 · answered by mammabear_327 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My second pregnancy was with twins and beleive it or not I was smaller--by about 35lbs. There was no labor as I had a C-Section at 39 weeks. And the twins were smaller by a lb.
1st-8.4
2nd-6.6 and 6.0
2007-04-02 07:20:51 · answer #4 · answered by deejei1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was bigger second time, the labour was slightly longer, but easier to cope with, and she weighed more than half a pound more than the first.
2007-04-02 07:14:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was smaller and the labour was shorter, almost by half. My baby was exactly the same size as his sister, but I have always heard you get bigger with girls, and in my case, it rang true.
2007-04-02 07:25:07 · answer #6 · answered by AsianPersuasion :) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haven't gone into labor yet, but I am WAY bigger this time than last time, and hoolding A LOT more water. Probably not what you wanted to hear, but maybe it will help!
2007-04-02 07:12:18 · answer #7 · answered by Jeni 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was actually smaller..most women are bigger.
2nd labor was much shorter.....although the 3rd was the longest!!!
2nd baby was 3oz bigger that was it!!
2007-04-02 07:11:21 · answer #8 · answered by got all I need 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was bigger.
The labor was shorter.
Baby weighed less.
2007-04-02 07:18:17 · answer #9 · answered by Jewels 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was bigger.
The labor was longer.
Second child weighed 1lb more.
2007-04-02 07:08:36 · answer #10 · answered by ncc742 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋