It's two for one asinine questions.
2007-04-02 06:47:47 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
First Question: Never
Second Question: Not I.
2007-04-02 06:50:15 · answer #1 · answered by Captain Moe 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
First question-I can't see into the future.
Second question-We all know Bush flew on the back of his invisible moonbat and shot lasers into the WTC and projected a hologram of planes flying into the towers.
As he was doing that,Dick Cheney broke out his force lightning and all asploded the Pentagon and stuff.
Where's my money?i just solved 9/11 and demand payment!
Edit-Somebody needs to explain the concept of sarcasm to iron pants above me.
2007-04-02 13:53:46 · answer #2 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They leave office on January 20, 2009. Shortly thereafter the war crimes begin. The trial will be held in international court in TheHage, Netherlands.
2007-04-02 14:00:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
1. After you report them to the authorities.
2. Bush is only responsible for golf.
2007-04-02 14:06:37 · answer #4 · answered by Feeling Mutual 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think we have investigated enough to truly know. Any attempts at a thourough investigation has been blocked by our President...it took over a year to get the investigation rolling. We also spent 8x the money investigating Clinton's sexual indiscretions than a terrorist attack on our own soil. Why wouldn't anyone be suspicious?
2007-04-02 13:55:26 · answer #5 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
1st Question: Why do you idiots insist on asking this over and over again. There will be no war crimes trial or impeachment -- get over yourseleves
2nd Question: How can you even rationalize such a statement
2007-04-02 13:53:14 · answer #6 · answered by Bill in Kansas 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
But related.... I am convinced that Cheney and Bush and Silverstein and the past, cross dressing mayor of NYC, were involved.
2007-04-02 13:54:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
They should be. Bush is in a way responsible because his cabinet got all the info on the 911 plans and then did nothing about it: specifically Condoloser Rice ignored what was told to her.
2007-04-02 13:51:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
That's OK. People will answer asinine questions for the points, just like me. Thanks.
2007-04-02 13:56:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer will always be the same no matter how it is asked. Never. You can not impeach anyone because you don't agree with them.
2007-04-02 13:51:04 · answer #10 · answered by RUSH MAKES OBAMA CRY !! A LOT !! 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋