English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-02 05:23:45 · 7 answers · asked by cee v 1 in Politics & Government Elections

7 answers

It was just a coincidence that it fell exactly onto its own footprint, just like the first two did. Everybody knows that when buildings structurally fail they fall exactly on their own footprint. It is also just a coincidence that the third building support steel was NOT symmetrical and that the fires and damage happened in such a coincidental way as to cause completely symmetical (straight down) collapse of the building. It is also just a coincidence that MULTIPLE firefighters and emergency personnel described explosions like a belt all the way around the tower, or like a building being imploded. It is just a coincidence that all the evidence was carted off and destroyed and coincidence that a few foreigners could easily evade the US security and defenses.

2007-04-02 12:01:59 · answer #1 · answered by Someone who cares 7 · 0 0

See the scientists report from Popular Mechanics. Then compare there educated engineers opinions with those of Rosie and the other Idiots.

2007-04-02 22:26:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because of fire and wreckage from the collapse of the other much larger buildings which towered above it.
Simple.
BTW, did you loosen up that tin foil hat yet like i told you to do a few minutes ago?

2007-04-02 12:29:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

You talking about that short one across the street? It collapsed due to compromised structural integrity.

2007-04-02 12:28:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7___silverstein.html

2007-04-02 12:27:29 · answer #5 · answered by wizjp 7 · 2 0

go ask rosie o'dumbell you treasonous shmuck!

2007-04-02 12:27:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

GRAVITY!!!!

2007-04-02 13:13:37 · answer #7 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers