2007-04-02 04:45:31 · 15 answers · asked by Yasmin 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Buy a dictionary. Impeachment is prosecution for a crime. Since no crime has been committed, there can be no impeachment. Just because you disagree with the policies of the administration does not mean you get to grab a pitchfork and scream for a lynching.
2007-04-02 04:53:16 · answer #1 · answered by Bill in Kansas 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If you impeach either Bush or Cheney, we'd be stuck with the other one.
So they both need to be impeached at the same time; not only impeached, but removed from office.
Then sent to Germany to stand trial for Crimes Against Humanity (with the whole gang).
Not that this is going to happen, but, a girl can DREAM, can't she?
Once we get both Decider and Vice Decider out, the new pres can get rid of the rest of the sludge.
2007-04-02 09:49:54 · answer #2 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the minute something illegal takes place, i'll be next on board with this impeachment talk. but, until then, i say talk about something else cause this is just a waste of time. there was/is nothing illegal going on. too many people were quick to jump on this bandwagon without understanding what has taken place. this was just another way for the Democratic party to attempt (miserably) at gaining more political points with your average, no researching, voter. they are in a corner and are trying their worse at scamming the american people to gain votes for the '08 election.
2007-04-02 05:15:06 · answer #3 · answered by jasonsluck13 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe the plan is to impeach in 2008...
2007-04-02 05:10:19 · answer #4 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry to burst your bubble, but aint gonna be anyone impeached.
2007-04-02 05:11:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets impeach all of the so called washington crowd Our wonderful Leaders.
2007-04-02 04:52:39 · answer #6 · answered by Gypsy Gal 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
We should impeach all of them. Working against the public interest, and knowingly endangering the American people for personal profit, that has to be a crime. If not we need to seriously update our laws.
2007-04-02 05:13:34 · answer #7 · answered by USAobserver161 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes, we not only should impeach Bush but also Chaney and wether or not they resigned or no longer in this administration, Rumsfelt and Powell as well, remember, he was the one to sit there in that international body and claimed 'we have evidence that strongly suggest Sadam does have WMD's and intends to use them' .
As a matter of fact, let's impeach EVERY republicans, I mean congressmen and senators, every single one of them, for voting and pressuring their democratic counterpart to vote to give Bush that broad sweeping executive power to wage war anywhere and anytime he chooses.
2007-04-02 05:00:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Impeach Bush and Cheney. Pelosi would take over. I believe there are plenty of crimes is looked into.
2007-04-02 04:53:37 · answer #9 · answered by rob c 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
How many times do you people need to be told?
NO CRIME = NO IMPEACHMENT.
NO CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED BY ANY MEMBER OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION, THEREFORE THERE CANNOT BE AN IMPEACHMENT.
2007-04-02 04:50:54 · answer #10 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋