If you can't see the writing on the wall ($36,000,000 in fundraising in the first quarter of 2007), then you are blind.
It's time for the wealthy to pay for their crimes.
2007-04-02 04:27:57 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I know that your one of the message board trolls most likely Shiraz, but you didn't truly predict the outcome of the last election. Republicans got a beaten, and it would have been a lot worse if all of the Senate seats were up for reelection.
2007-04-02 07:03:11 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the time money talks. But it doesn't guarantee you the Presidency. I would rather see America not ever elected another Bush or a Clinton. But it doesn't mean that Hillary has bought the Presidency.
Anyone who criticizes her needs to remember Bush spent about $370 million for the 2004 election.
Is the office worth $370 million? Now that is a question that should be asked.
2007-04-02 11:46:09 · answer #2 · answered by kenny J 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny..you state that it is time for the wealthy to pay for their crimes, but advocate a rich, well connected and demonstrably unstable person for the presidency. You don't realize that cronyism with her would reach higher levels than it did with GWB (look at her plan for universal health care, a plan for lawyers by lawyers...her cronies)...I still don't understand why people like you are so sure that the wealthy could only get that way by being criminals..sure there are some that did, but most did not.
2007-04-02 12:52:59 · answer #3 · answered by kerfitz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She can't be any worse then George Bush, how does an idiot like him get to become president of the United States, is my question. Hillary is smart woman, plus she has her husband to assist her. I love Bill Clinton, even though he did make a mistake. When he was in office things were moving up, instead of down like they are now. I'm scared to know where we will end up with the president we have.
2007-04-02 11:39:30 · answer #4 · answered by Pinklady 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She has done a great job of fund raising there is no doubt. I do think however that it may be a bit early to open the Champagne.
Hillary may be popular with people writing checks but she has some serious popularity issues with the voting public. I think it will be an interesting race. I am certainly looking forward to being very well entertained.
2007-04-02 11:34:50 · answer #5 · answered by Snap 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no "writing on the wall." Hillary will NOT be our next president. She will NEVER be our president.
She is a shrill, leftist socialist witch that will say anything for a vote. She even faked a southern accent to impress people.
There is talk that her campaign is "loosing stream." Sure she raised lots of money but that doesn't mean it will continue.
While Obama is the "darling" of the media now, he is way to inexperienced and can't win. He's a leftist socialist too.
2007-04-02 11:34:30 · answer #6 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
People think the country is in bad shape now ...
If Hillary becomes President, it will be much worse.
Her only chance is because people are sick of a Republican president, but lets hope that they don't vote for her just because she's a democrat.
People need to start looking at the person and not just the party.
2007-04-04 02:59:58 · answer #7 · answered by hollybear1280 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is one of the wealthy and I'm still waiting for the Clinton Cartel to pay for their crimes. The problem seems to be that the loopy libs are all to willing to make excuses for these two crooks. I also believe that she couldn't get elected if she were the only candidate.
No one knew the incriminating records from the Rose Law Firm were actually stored in the WHITE HOUSE? Tell me again how the Clintons aren't crooks??????
2007-04-02 11:34:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Early fund raising is not evidence that it will continue and having the most to spend does not guarantee you will win at any time. Hilary still has much competition in the Democratic primaries and if she is the nominee she will be target number one for all Reps since she is a lightening rod for them due to her past work in the Clinton White house and on issues in the Senate. She is the most detested of the Dem candidates to Republicans and they will not only empty their pocketbooks to defeat her but not sit home as they did in 2006.
2007-04-02 11:36:09 · answer #9 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The writing has been on the wall for a long time. Money will not elect Hillary, it will be fed up Americans that spoke loud and clear last November.
2007-04-02 16:04:16 · answer #10 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋