2007-04-02 04:13:43 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
its possible
unlikely though
2007-04-02 04:17:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do think that the Loch Ness monster could be a possibility, though I'm far from convinced, but what the existence of giant squids has to do with it, I'll never know. It falls along the same notion that the probability of a result of an individual coin flip is unaffected by previous coin flips of that or any other coin. Just because one supposedly mythological beast is proven to exist, even if not in quite the form expected, it doesn't mean or change the probability that others do or don't.
2007-04-02 11:33:00 · answer #2 · answered by PCGuyIV 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Giant squids have been verified via carcasses and recently, a photo by a Japanese scientist. As for the Loch Ness monster, it is possible. The Giant Squid is considered to be rather numerous since the Sperm Whales eat them as part of their regular diet. Yet the Giant Squid has only fairly recently been detected and studied with very limited resources. Considering this, It would seem very possible that some create lives in Loch Ness that may be few in numbers and has yet to be detected with undeniable proof.
2007-04-02 11:27:49 · answer #3 · answered by ThePerfectStranger 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not necessarily but anything is possible (though unlikely). Giant squid are not prehistoric. They are giant because they have evolved according to their environmental circumstances. Generally they are only found in deep ocean areas. The Loch Ness monster is seemingly prehistoric in appearance and has not reiably been seen.
2007-04-02 11:26:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haven't carcasses of giant squids washed up before? It was materially verifiable, then.
The Loch Ness monster is as real as giant sea serpent in the metro sewer system.
2007-04-02 11:17:35 · answer #5 · answered by JC 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trust me.. the LNM is real. According to my knowledge of Loch Ness, Nessie could really exist. My guess is that "Nessie" is a family of pleisiosaurs that escaped the Meteor and the Ice Age by hiding in a series of underwater caves, which slowly became landlocked as Loch Ness. GUYS JUST SEND A BLOODY SUBMERSIBLE INTO THE CAVES!!!!!
2007-04-02 15:21:13 · answer #6 · answered by LedZeppelin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It does not follow. The Loch Ness Monster is a publicity stunt.
2007-04-02 20:26:51 · answer #7 · answered by fatboycool 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the most current theories surrounding "nessie" i believe have to do with her being a descendant of the plesiosaur trapped in the huge system of caves in loch ness' murky depths.
the squid seems to be disconnected from this really. there has been no real substantiated evidence of "nessie's" existence unfortunately.
like the coelacanth or the giant squid we can always be surprised, however.
2007-04-02 11:20:15 · answer #8 · answered by bluebear 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The lochness monster is not shaped like a squid so I don't think that is relevant. It kind of looks more like a swimming dragon.
2007-04-02 15:15:30 · answer #9 · answered by Rich Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People try to fit a lot through the sometime very narrow crack of "possible". It is very unlikely. The Loch is not a food rich environment. There isn't a reasonable chance that large sea life of any kind could survive in it.
2007-04-02 11:43:39 · answer #10 · answered by Herodotus 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
its possible. some say that the lochness monster could have influenced the squids of today. they said that the squid had evolved from the monster itself
2007-04-02 11:18:52 · answer #11 · answered by gamefreak2949 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋