English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

34 answers

It must be like when you bush supporters saw what happened on 9/11 and you still voted for bush AGAIN!

2007-04-01 17:37:10 · answer #1 · answered by chickenhawk_plucker 2 · 13 11

I ain't gunna lie, I don't know who Sandy Burger is, but I'm tired of Republicans being in office, so if she wins the primary, I'm going with her. And if this story you mention was a mistake by Bill Clinton, then how would it affect Hillary Clinton? Whatever mistake he made wasn't her bad. Don't tell me though, that you support the war, and that you support leaving people's family members out there in hostile territory where they are getting killed each day, without proper weaponry and other aids. And don't tell me you like high gas prices, which we can agree have increased severely AFTER Bill left office. And don't even tell me you like the debt that the USA is in, which I also believe has gotten larger after Bill left. Yea Bill made bad moves (sleeping with Monica), but it's pretty evident that the welfare of the country has suffered since bush was elected. I'm going to view Hillary not as the wife of Bill Clinton, but as Hillary Clinton, somone who could very well be running for president for the Democratic Party. She has nothing to do with that guy in this election. She's her own person.

2007-04-01 17:57:41 · answer #2 · answered by SHARK 2 · 0 2

I didn't vote for the first Clinton, so I sure won't be voting for the second. She won't win anyway--despite all the feminists ruining our country, we're still a male-dominant nation, and most males don't want a woman in the White House. Why back a losing horse?

2007-04-01 17:57:39 · answer #3 · answered by p2of9 4 · 1 0

I couldn't. I would never vote for a Clinton. The country's future is far to valuable.

2007-04-01 21:39:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

George Bush's grandfather was the principal Nazi fundraiser in the United States and people still voted for him .
Both parties are sociopathic , dont you find it suspicious that every debate is confined to a left - right argument ? Its as though we are supposed to believe solutions can only be found if they are presented by a major party ideologue .

2007-04-01 17:55:13 · answer #5 · answered by Parapet 3 · 0 2

Wait and see! The nomination for the 2008 presidential contest is pretty clouded!

2007-04-01 17:55:28 · answer #6 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0 0

I find the recent US attorney debacle a better reason to stay clear of Hilary. The media has done nothing to provide perspective. Bush's team fires 8 US attorneys. He has the legal right to do so and was actually late getting around to it. You want US attorney's who reflect your party's interest. Clinton fired 92 (93?) in one fell swoop. What's worse is Clinton fired the lead prosecuter who was investigating the White Water scandal and replaced him with a former law student of his. So he puts a crony in charge of the investigation of himself.

And yeah, Sandy Burglar stuffs secret documents in his pants, socks, whatever it was, and didn't go to jail. Any normal Joe would have seen time for that. Stealing secret documents from the National Archive!!!!! The Clintons are as dirty and self serving as they come. I hope the Democrats can do better.

2007-04-01 17:43:38 · answer #7 · answered by colorado_df 2 · 8 4

I wouldn't vote for another Clinton without hearing the sickening story of Sandy Berger!

2007-04-01 17:41:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 6

What???????

You mean to tell me you don't accidentally stuff sensitive documents in your underwear and socks??? Come on!!

Actually, I think what happened is that he heard "Shook me all night long" by ac/dc over the archives public address system and decide to mimic a scene from the movie "Striptease."
Funny things happen to documents during moments like that.

Edit: The general lack of knowledge about this story is pretty pathetic.

2007-04-01 17:45:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

I couldn't vote for Hillary even before Berger. What is shredding important documents when compared to giving China plans for nuclear warheads because they need to be equal to America? The Clintons are so anti-American.

So many Americans are anti-American. They probably look forward to Sharia law being imposed as a positive reform to our legal system!
.

2007-04-01 17:46:07 · answer #10 · answered by Susan M 7 · 8 3

Can you not see that Fox is running this now to try to get Hilary in the hot seat before the nominations start and she had nothing to do with the affair.

Actually Bush was in on the Sandy Berger thing because the papers Berger stole implicated both Bush and Clinton; that is the reason this has not been an event and the Republicans have kept a low profile on it, until now but it is going to backfire on Bush.

2007-04-01 17:46:30 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 7

fedest.com, questions and answers