Since the ONLY way to fight global warming is to elimate green house gases, which green house gas should we ban?
Eliminating CO2 would kill all plant life and require all animals to stop breathing, while eliminating H20 will simply require both plants and animals to die of dehydration.
My personal choice would be H20 since it is a far greater contributer to the problem of global warming.
Ever notice how its hotter on nights where there is an overcast sky? That my friend is a direct result of this dangerous chemical of H20.
Which harmful green house gas would you like to see eliminated?
2007-04-01 17:25:26 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Argle my good friend: Do you deny that both of these chemicals are green house gases? Or do you deny that H20 is the greater contributer to the green house gas effect?
2007-04-01 17:30:42 · update #1
Both that way we all die of thirst before we burn to death. Or we could just listen to one of Al Gore's speeches and die of boredom.
As someone once said, this self-proclaimed Emperor of All Gaseous Emmsions should go back to acting instead of whatever he's trying to do now...
2007-04-01 17:28:55 · answer #1 · answered by Jack O'Neill 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
or do we just ignore all the political and biased scientific reports and actually research it ourselves and make our own informed opinion and decide for ourselves how we as individuals can "stop" global warming hate to burst everyones bubble but it is a natural thing this global warming and asking Americans to stop driving, eating, drinking breathing or anything or for that matter anyone on this earth to stop doing everything is just simply asine because if we filter through all this bullshit we will find the truth that global warming is the earths natural aging process. The planet is a living being as well. I am not against t saving and protecting mother earth I am however against the media and the politicians and the Hollywood folks hyping up yet another stupid worthless cause that will be gone in a couple of years.
2007-04-01 17:53:42 · answer #2 · answered by xmenforever2004 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, nobody says we should get rid of all CO2. Or all green house gases. They're talking about industrial CO2. We're not talking about CO2 and other green house gases coming from animals & humans. They're talking about CO2 produced by industrial processes.
No idiot run around saying we must put total absolute CO2 ban.
Idea is that burning fossil fuel is causing build up of CO2 faster then plants can breath. We can engineer ways to get around that by burning less or no fossil fuel. That's what they want. They're not tellig you to stop breathing out CO2.
We can't control water easily as we can with industrial CO2. Water does contribute with feedback system in global warming, but that feedback effect will be reduced if climate gets cooler. Less water gas in atmosphere as it cools.
You got very Stupid idea, and very cliche, but no such thing as stupid question I guess.
I'll put it this way.
Let's say you're driving and you can't stop. Somebody put blow torch to your car's engine. The engine overheats. Would you get rid of that torch to help your engine cool down? Or turn off the engine to cool the engine? It'll be stupid not to take that torch away don't you think?
What would you do? Because your engine is producing heat right?
And to be sure, almost every global warming proponents call for 'reduction' of CO2 and not complete ban other then few.
2007-04-01 17:37:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
None.
The greenhouse house effect is needed to survive on earth, otherwise we will all be freezing.
CO2 in the atmosphere is only 10ppm, it's 0.054% of all gases in the atmosphere. And 95% of greenhouse gases is H2O.
Eliminating CO2 will barely have an effect on the greenhouse effect. Aside to mention that it is also impossible to eliminate it. Main sources of CO2 are not humans. It's the ocean, volcanoes, animals and decaying material.
None should be eliminated since the greenhouse effect is not the main cause of GlobalWarming.
http://www.goglobalwarmingawareness2007.com/globalwarming-is-not-due-to-manmade-carbon-dioxide.html
2007-04-02 00:22:26 · answer #4 · answered by benjarriola 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What the??? H2O doesn't stay in our atmosphere and trap heat like CO2. It rains! And yes, CO2 does get inhaled by plants, but it is about balance. Our Earth is like an aquarium. You have to have the right balance for it to be healthy. We need both CO2 and H2O but we don't screw with the water like we do with the CO2. It isn't a matter of one or the other. It's about keeping healthy levels of both. If we released tons of water into the atmosphere everyday, it would be a problem, we just don't do that... Yet.
2007-04-01 17:31:50 · answer #5 · answered by stevenhendon 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i will admit that CO2 is necessary for our survival, but it must be at a level that does not destroy the balance....the Earth also does vary in temperature over thousnads of years, but the period we are living in is experiencing the greatest rise in 100 years than it ever has...You can deny science...the same science you depend on every time you go to the doctor, use a cell phone or log onto your computer...as much as you want, but when physics catches up to you you will be as dead as any dodo that couldn't fly.
2007-04-01 17:40:27 · answer #6 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good show.
Banning chemicals, especially these two, which are intricately linked with life on this planet, would never work.
2007-04-01 17:30:32 · answer #7 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Excess co2 is very harmful to the atmosphere. That needs to be seriously controlled.
2007-04-01 17:31:43 · answer #8 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
We could just keep planting more trees.
2007-04-01 17:39:30 · answer #9 · answered by Shrink 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about we plug all of the politicians and Religious Theocratic mouths; that ought to take care of the problem! LOL
2007-04-01 17:31:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋