English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

seems science is trying harder to prove against creation rather than for creation.

2007-04-01 16:58:06 · 11 answers · asked by james h 2 in Science & Mathematics Physics

11 answers

They would have to re-write all the known laws that govern physics to do that.

Words of advice: Lack of complete understanding does not amount to complete lack of understanding.
Inability to produce physical existence does not amount to proof of non-existence.

2007-04-01 17:10:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Science can certainly prove that traditional creation myths - such as those in the Judeo Christian texts (there are more than one) - are nonsense.

It can also demonstrate that there is no need to invoke a god to explain the universe. Moreover, that introducing a god just creates more problems (of the "if god created the universe, who created god, and whoe created god's god..." type).

It can no more prove there is a god that Christians can. This may be because - like Bertrand Russel's teapot orbiting Mars (you can't prove its not there, but that does not mean it is) - there is no god to be proved. Or it may be because god hides (why he would do this is a bit of a mystery).

2007-04-01 21:19:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No. Ironically, I am a believer in a more scientific explanation of man kinds origins and the origins of the planets, stars, etc, ets... but I also know that the hardest thing known to mankind to combat is another persons beliefs. There are people who believe that the planet is flat, while others believe science has proven them wrong. People believe that man never landed on the moon, yet there is a sample of rock in the Smithsonian labeled "Moon Rock". In my opinion, the one variable that science or mathematical formula's can't account for is the free will of choice.

2007-04-01 17:21:08 · answer #3 · answered by Korn E Lious 1 · 1 0

you'd be at liberty to comprehend it became my lack of ability to guard those beliefs that led me to the perception that this way of being because the mono-deity defined by technique of the Bible, or any mono-deity, can no longer exist :-) Edit: Oh, Gawd. If God inspired the e book, it really is a.) completely sparkling if our little immortal souls were at stake and God lets loose a sneaky tempter to trick God's 'loved' creation into an eternity of suffering (how loving of Him). b.)the author's ought to also be one hundred% precise. (no metaphorical the following, literal there excuses) I see lots of you confuse the be conscious 'gentle' with the solar. 'gentle' became the first day, the solar became on the fourth. 'Gravity' is 'only a theory'. If the earth 'hangs' in air, what's it putting from? I see how the verses would properly be interpreted extremely it seems that because the earth being a flat 'circle' yet i am going to also see how someone cherry-alternatives their way into believing it would properly be twisted common sense explaining the earth is a sphere. nevertheless, i have not seen/study some thing on the following it is replaced my concepts or made me imagine, 'Gee, perhaps I ought to extremely twist meanings and understandings round if it conflicts with my undemanding experience'.

2016-12-03 03:33:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

interestingly, there is a scientific answer to your question.

currently it is believed that science CANNOT disprove the existence of god.

this is because the existence of god can always be proved at a later date from when this question is asked. ( it is the goal of science to pursue the unknown ).

if and when god is proven to exist, then god too will become the domain of science !

one alternative to this is the conception of the "omega point", which is a theoretical point in time when ALL that is to be known will be known. it is possible that if this point is reached, then if no evidence of god is found, it will then be proved that god does not exist.

hope you were satisfied.

:)

2007-04-01 17:23:48 · answer #5 · answered by fullbony 4 · 0 0

Prove to me there is not a small teacup in orbit around Jupiter. Until you do, I will keep my absolute faith that it is there.

Scientists are "trying harder" to discover truth. It is religious nuts like you that first decide what is true the start "trying harder" to prove it.

2007-04-02 14:13:18 · answer #6 · answered by Dr. R 7 · 0 0

Since "science" is a method of observations made by people and people didn't watch the beginning, nobody will ever be able to prove it, or disprove it.

2007-04-01 17:02:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anniekd 6 · 0 0

as previously stated, science is observations and conclusions. so no, we as human beings cannot determine wether or not it happened that way. BUT we have been able to disprove several parts of the bible according to dating. dates in the bible have proven to be completely impossabe due to science

2007-04-01 17:10:26 · answer #8 · answered by popeye 3 · 0 0

No. One cannot prove that God does not exist.

2007-04-01 17:05:38 · answer #9 · answered by fatboycool 4 · 0 0

I dont think we are ever going to really figure that out.

2007-04-01 17:02:45 · answer #10 · answered by Esmy =] 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers