English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm not really sure what to think of her.

2007-04-01 15:19:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

No politician is perfect. She's the best of the sorry lot, however. She has been in the White House, seen what works and what doesn't, is very smart, knows foreign affairs, is not likely to start a war just for the hell of it, is intuitive, concerned about the future of the world, about the have-nots as well as the rest of us, about health care, about religious freedom, racial diversity, all those good liberal causes - and not just because they are liberal. She's pragmatic - something Republicans are not.
And she's a woman - what better time to find out just what a woman can do. The men so far have been a pretty sorry lot, some of course sorrier than others..

2007-04-01 15:28:25 · answer #1 · answered by Grist 6 · 2 1

I'm not a Democrat, so perhaps I shouldn't be answering. I'm a moderate Independent. I am campaigning for Hillary Clinton and I support her totally. I like her plan for Iraq, her stand on domestic issues, and her intention to return the United States to the respect it deserves from the rest of the world. She will truly address the War on Terror, and has already given details of that in her war plan. She's brilliant, and she's one tough lady. A cautious hawk who understands the need for and uses of diplomacy before military action. I think she's just what this country needs.

EZMZ: You are posting false information. This has already been completely debunked. Paul Harvey has already acknowledged it never happened. That makes it spam, just so you know. Here's the link for the debunking of yet another Hillary Clinton character assassination piece:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/...

2007-04-01 23:08:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

hmm. I don't really like her face, she really needs to get some botox or something.

but other than that i'm cool. I'm voting for her this primary. This country needs a clinton after what bush has done. (btw, Bill CLinton (best president of us history) will be in the house again, and he'll help put this country back on the tracks we were in in the 90's.

2007-04-01 22:23:39 · answer #3 · answered by Logical Rationalist 4 · 2 1

I have been supporting her since before she announced she was a candidate,, but I am a Blue Dog Democrat,, I think the US needs a centrist,, and a moderate,,,, although,,
Bush claims that he is a moderate,, he is not,,, he is more liberal than most Republicans,, ,,, he is not a conservative,,, look at the deficit,,, but listens to the GOP,, because he was raised to,,,,,

2007-04-01 22:24:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Actually, she is a little to conservative for me, and it shows in a lot of her views! That must be because she use to be a Republican.

Why is it that Republicans think there are no Democrats that are Conservative? Not so!

I would vote for her over Obama!

2007-04-01 22:24:10 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1 1

I hate the fact that President Hilary will be heading the ticket that drives the neo-cons from power - much as St. Patrick rid Ireland of it's snakes.

2007-04-01 22:23:35 · answer #6 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 1 2

Careful. Do research before you vote -------------------------THIS WILL OPEN YOUR EYES by Paul Harvey
>
> Conveniently Forgotten Facts Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers
> decided that a fellow black panther named...Alex Rackley needed to die.
>
> Rackley was suspected of disloyalty.
>
> Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends
> tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water
> on him. When they got tired of torturing Rackley. Panther member
> Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head.
>
> Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north
> of New Haven, Conn. Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what
> happened to these Black Panthers. In 1977, that's only eight years later,
> only one of the killers was still in jail.
>
> The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard
> and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later became an
> assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't that
> something?
> As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head and a few
years
> later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean! Only
in
> America!
>
> Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water
> for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a
> California School Board.
>
> How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy?
>
> Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to
> the defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to
> shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused
> Black
> Panthers during their trial.
>
> One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan
> Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a
> California School Board. He was head of the US Justice Department's Civil
> Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.
>
> O.K., so who was the other Panther defender?
>

> Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member?>
> Is this other Panther apologist CCow an assistant college dean?
>
> No, neither! The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law
student
> at Yale University at the time. She is now known as the "one of the
smartest
> woman in the world" (and may well become the next president of the United
> States). She is none other than the Democratic senator from the State of
> New York----our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.
>
> And now, as Paul Harvey said; You know "the rest of the story".
>
> Just a reminder as she runs for President

2007-04-01 22:26:53 · answer #7 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 0 4

I personally like HIllary. I think that she would make a great President. However, I will not vote for her. I think that would be throwing my vote away. Unfortunately, I do not think enough people will vote for her...therefore, if the Democrats choose her as their nominee for President, it is all but handing the Presidency to the Republicans.

I am sick of the Democrats getting behind "safe" candidates who turn out to be losers.

2007-04-01 22:23:27 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. G 6 · 0 4

That she may be in jeopardy if she gets elected Commander in Chief. She may do some great things, but she brings an element to the presidency that is a total unknown quantity.

2007-04-01 22:22:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Hillary is an accident waiting to happen. She does not have her finger on the pulse of this country. Her entire agenda is to be elected. She has no idea what to do if she wins.

2007-04-01 22:25:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers