2007-04-01 14:30:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, lets see. If Osama Bin Ladin were to set the agenda what would he want?
1) Get the American troops out of Iraq.
2) Repeal the Patriot Act
3) Close Gitmo.
4) Cut military spending
5) Stop data mining
6) Cease wire tapping
7) Have terrorist prisoner tried in criminal court.
8) Assassinate Bush and Cheney.
9) Fire Halliburton
10) Elect democrats at all levels of the government.
I wonder if Hillary will select Osama to be her running mate.
.
2007-04-01 14:51:18 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Dems are profiting off the war right now and are secretly promoting the war. Look at Senator Feinstein who stepped down from her Senate Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee because she was passing overseas military contracts to her husband. She even went overseas to supervise the construction. Barbara Boxer is making a lot of loot also. The Dems come out in the government/media complex as being against the war just for the votes.
2007-04-01 21:38:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
They are going to have to wear down the opposition, as Dems do not have the super majority, (Lieberman, etc) and pres still has veto power. You know darn well that if they cut funding, people like you will say they are not supporting the troops (Walter Reed etc ) it is your job to figure out that there is no winning this war, as some Republicans have had the guts to admit. (Warner, Hagel, Iraq Study Group bipartisan) Then, you pressure your Republican congress, and we have a way out. Don't laugh. There is nothing funny about this stupid war. Dems are not staying the course. FYI. Bush's latest claim that this was a surge...a surge is a wave and a pull back, but he still doesn't want a conclusion, and he can't define winning. There is no front on this war, there is no uniform. Who is the enemy? Wrong war, wrong commander in chief.
2007-04-01 21:42:50 · answer #3 · answered by dan b 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't know why I even bother with hopeless cases like you but let me ask you this. Even if the democrats get a bill to send to Bush, if he vetos it, how will they get a 60% margin to over ride the veto without some republican support. Ah, forget it, I don't want to overload your mechanism that serves as your brain.
2007-04-01 21:43:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Exactly! We are not ever going to pull out of Iraq. Democrats will indeed stay the course.
But you play games with these responders out of boredom, a laugh?
2007-04-01 21:34:52 · answer #5 · answered by raymond b 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, Democrats are for CHANGING the course in Iraq
2007-04-01 21:41:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're right. They can't end the war.
Because an idiot has the last say.
2007-04-01 21:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, kinda like having to stay in a car driven by a drunk who won't slow down so you can get out.
2007-04-01 21:35:06 · answer #8 · answered by redphish 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Do they have a choice? I mean, are you blaming the war on the dems now? Give me a fvcking break.
GW's vetoeing the bill. And, 10 more soldiers died today for the Bush family profits and for the Prince Bandaher profits in Halliburton and oil. I hope you're happy.
2007-04-01 21:33:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 7⤋
You should mind the republican business, kid, dems will take care of everything, but only after republicans have shown how exactly incompetent they are. Dumbya is an idiot, but let's see just how bad a butthole he is.
2007-04-01 21:33:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋