i would have Bill , Hillary, Chelsea or even the Clinton dog before Bush. My hairdresser would be a better president.. and anyone at all could be a better human being.
I wonder how he likes being one of the most, if not the most hated man on earth. Probably doesn't even bother him.. he is not bright enough to understand it.
2007-04-01 14:28:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Just remember, Jimmy Carter put our Country in the toilet. Mr Reagan brought our Country to the only Super power, good economy lots of jobs stock market soaring within eight years. Mr Bush 41 kept things going, good housing, jobs money,etc. four years. Slick willy had a good start. Then let fa gs in the Military. Then he blew it year after year(yea he might some good things?). Then he disgraced the Oval Office and Our Country. Stock market started a down slope fast, economy suffered so did the Americans. Gave up in four to five years what it took the Republicans 12 years to clean up after the dims mess our Country up. Mr Bush has had a difficult two terms. I am glad Kerry or Clinton wasn't in office during this time,we would not have a Country left they would have given it away because they did not have the balls to stand up to the enemy. Coward sissy-men
2007-04-05 20:36:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
"At a time when the nation is bogged down in the war in Iraq and chafing under Bush's leadership, Bill Clinton's tenure is taking on a rosier glow. In the USA Today/Gallup Poll, 71% said he was a good president - more than double Bush's 34% approval rating." ~ USA Today March 29, 2007
I'm guessing that most people would take Clinton back in a heartbeat!
2007-04-01 21:25:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
amen, brother flash, amen.
I'd rather have a drunk coke user than Bush, oh wait we have that.
I like Bush's untenable position on global warming and fossil fuels. He's dragging his feet on global warming and oil, even though the use of oil is making us vulnerable.
Or his dedication to unscientific logic regarding a missile defense system (who would we be protecting ourselves from). Anyone who shoots a missile at us, even thousands of them will die with us. We need security to keep terrorists from sneaking things in, not a defense against something that is unlikely.
Both of these thing are useless or counterproductive to the public, but supply big bucks to certain corporations. His main man William Krystol is not a scientist and supplies all the wisdom in regards to stem cells (he's on the president's bio-ethics council) as well as day to day policy. Her is the flag bearer of the Neo-Con movement. In ten years Neo-cons will be yesterday's news just like MacCarthy and his right wing nuts
2007-04-01 21:24:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ford Prefect 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton was never my favorite, but he did less harm than Bush.
I don't give Clinton credit for it, though. Mostly, when Clinton was president, he had a Republican Congress to fight him when he wanted to do something stupid. For some reason, when Bush tried to do the same stupid things, the Republican Congress sucked up their principles and stuck to their party loyalty instead of loyalty to principle. So, it is the failure of Republicans to hold onto their principles that caused the disaster of Bush. It takes a lot of guts to stand up to a sitting president in your own party and most Republicans chickened out.
That's why I respect Republicans like Rep. Ron Paul, who has spoken out against the war and against Bush on many of these policies. He recently announced that he's running for president on the Republican ticket. Let's see if there are enough other Republicans like me who are fed up and are willing to vote for change.
2007-04-01 21:31:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by skip742 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Newt "I want a divorce before you die of cancer" Gingrich and Tom "Drunken womanizer" Delay led the attack on Clinton. Strange how these two Hypocrites could question Clintons Morals when they were doing the same. The Family Values party indeed. My vote is for BILL.
2007-04-01 21:28:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rudedog 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
I know...
So Clinton got a BJ and the country was all up in arms over it...
Now let's see here:
No WMD..not one
No Osama...not even a good lead on his location
No end in sight...mission accomplished my foot
Saddam is dead! That's what we went there for right?
Not one of the 9/11 hijackers was even Iraqi. What are we doing there?
How many countries harbor terrorists and hate America? I don't know but we haven't lost 3500 soldiers for nothing in any of the other ones....
Bush makes me sick....can't wait to get rid of him.
2007-04-01 21:09:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tadow 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Clinton on his worst day is better than the whole Nazi family of Bush pigs.
2007-04-01 21:14:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Gee, this is a tough one...
I'll pay to pick President Clinton up in a limo, and shuttle him back to the White House.
2007-04-01 21:00:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by amg503 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Clinton, either one, I would rather see a tree frog as president then George Bush. .
2007-04-01 21:00:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋