English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

46 answers

that would be a resounding YES!

2007-04-01 13:22:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 12 6

No. Socialist parties, which have had much more popularity in Europe as leftist parties, are often much more liberal than the United States' Democratic party. The US Democratic party is actually rather moderate, there are just plenty of people that are left-wing, just as there are plenty of especially conservative Republicans. So, you can call it a Social Democratic party if ya want, but I wouldn't go so far to rename it a Socialist party.

Hope you read this!

2007-04-01 13:44:39 · answer #2 · answered by balisarius 2 · 5 3

Actually, I think Extreme Leftist Socialist Party might be a better name.

2007-04-02 04:10:42 · answer #3 · answered by Robert D 4 · 2 0

Are you talking about the Democratic Party in the U.S. or the Democrats in Australia or in another country. It would be good if you were specific. Neither the US Democratic Party or the Australian party could ever be called socialist. The US Democrats do not espouse "socialism" and are right-wing in politics . The Australian party, although moderate and in the centre as far as politics is concerned, also cannot be classed as 'socialist'. In fact it was founded by a former member of the Liberal Part of Australia, a right-wing political party.

2007-04-01 13:30:23 · answer #4 · answered by Walter B 7 · 3 5

Nah, names don't mean anything. Sure, the Democrats have been advocating mostly socialist policies recently, but they have no exclusive on socialism. Frankly, I think George Bush is more of a "big government type" than Bill Clinton ever was.

2007-04-01 13:55:11 · answer #5 · answered by skip742 6 · 3 2

Yes. They should also stop using the term liberal. A liberal is a person who supports freedom and limited government the exact oppositte of the Democratic Party. The left has a long history of hijacking good words for their cause. Besides democratice and liberal my favorite is progressive. ha.

2007-04-01 16:23:21 · answer #6 · answered by blahblah 4 · 1 1

No that would be stupid. The democrats have nothing to do with socialism. They believe in social programs to benefit the greatest number of people, tht is not what socialism is. The words just sound alike. Like the words magician and musican. They just sound alike. Maybe you should ask your teacher if you can stay in during recess and she can explain it to you, how words that sound alike don't necessarly mean the same thing.

2007-04-01 16:35:26 · answer #7 · answered by Fancy That 6 · 0 2

Most definetely. Any party that thinks the government can live people's lives better than the people should be considered socialist at least,if not just full fledged communists. Republicans are working on being just as bad.

2007-04-01 13:52:48 · answer #8 · answered by ravalli_5 2 · 3 3

Only if we can rename the Republican Party the "Theocratic Party"...it all seems fair to me.

2007-04-02 09:07:03 · answer #9 · answered by latech76 2 · 0 1

probably more like the Demon-cratic Party.

2007-04-02 11:58:01 · answer #10 · answered by mustanger 5 · 0 0

Just follow the money trail.


Careful. Do research before you vote -------------------------THIS WILL OPEN YOUR EYES by Paul Harvey
>
> Conveniently Forgotten Facts Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers
> decided that a fellow black panther named...Alex Rackley needed to die.
>
> Rackley was suspected of disloyalty.
>
> Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends
> tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water
> on him. When they got tired of torturing Rackley. Panther member
> Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head.
>
> Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north
> of New Haven, Conn. Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what
> happened to these Black Panthers. In 1977, that's only eight years later,
> only one of the killers was still in jail.
>
> The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard
> and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later became an
> assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't that
> something?
> As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head and a few
years
> later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean! Only
in
> America!
>
> Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water
> for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a
> California School Board.
>
> How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy?
>
> Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to
> the defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to
> shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused
> Black
> Panthers during their trial.
>
> One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan
> Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a
> California School Board. He was head of the US Justice Department's Civil
> Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.
>
> O.K., so who was the other Panther defender?
>

> Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member?>
> Is this other Panther apologist CCow an assistant college dean?
>
> No, neither! The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law
student
> at Yale University at the time. She is now known as the "one of the
smartest
> woman in the world" (and may well become the next president of the United
> States). She is none other than the Democratic senator from the State of
> New York----our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.
>
> And now, as Paul Harvey said; You know "the rest of the story".
>
> Just a reminder as she runs for President

2007-04-01 13:30:36 · answer #11 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 6 4

fedest.com, questions and answers