2007-04-01 12:24:37 · 23 answers · asked by Dead Birds Don't Poop 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nothing wrong, just not Her Royal Highness Billary.
2007-04-01 12:28:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 3⤋
This could be a good idea; Margaret Thatcher was a great leader for the UK. She dramatically improved their economy by reducing regulations and taxes and the size of govt. Hillary Clinton would be bad because the Socialism she promotes is the opposite of what Thatcher promoted. Clinton's Socialism has resulted in double the unemployment in France that the US has and double the suicide rate. The poor suffer most of all because there are less good jobs where they can work and learn new skills to serve others. This is the answer to poverty, not the massive govt Clinton pushes.
2007-04-01 19:34:19 · answer #2 · answered by Lighthearted 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Margret Thatcher did a good job for the British. I'm sure the US has some lady of her stature.
Looks like Hillary's ads on YA aren't paying off very well from the answers to your questions.
2007-04-02 10:04:59 · answer #3 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it's a good idea, but whenever I hear somebody talk about a female president or a black president or a hispanic one, I think that it doesn't necessarily guarantee they will make positive changes for any of those groups. the problem with our political system is bigger than one man or woman, and it's going to require an immense change in the American mentality for us to make a better society.
2007-04-01 19:47:18 · answer #4 · answered by nissanturboz 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's not a bad idea if we have a qualified candidate. At this point there are no qualified women running for president.
2007-04-01 19:33:16 · answer #5 · answered by jim h 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It isn't a bad idea but it's so hard to find a woman that can really pull it off, especially in todays world where so many of the worlds leaders don't see women as something to respect. Margret Thatcher I think was great!
2007-04-01 19:38:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
not a bad idea as long as the woman in question hasn't already been under the legal microscope and has a clear agenda as to how she plans to run the country. I would definetly back anyone, male or female if they have a clear set of priorities and can follow through with them.
2007-04-01 19:30:46 · answer #7 · answered by mike_dooley49 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Wouldn't be a bad idea at all, unless of course the woman was Hillary Clinton.
2007-04-01 19:30:38 · answer #8 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
It wouldn't... just Hillary becoming president would be a bad idea.
2007-04-01 19:30:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
A woman POTUS would be fine. At this time, there is a shortage of suitable female candidates. Hillary is unsuitable. I wouldn't let her swab my toilets.
2007-04-01 19:39:02 · answer #10 · answered by Delray 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I'll agree Condi Rice would make a great president!
(waited a few minutes to add this.. notice all the thumbs down, why is it that people from the left say we need a woman President, (But mention a women from the "Right" it is now a bad idea....hypocritical....hmmm.)
2007-04-01 19:28:19 · answer #11 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋