English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

While China and India is building their super economy and by 2020 it will outnumbered our economy by concentrating to their domestic policy , we , the USA is pretty much occupied in our failed foreign policy and bringing disaster to ourselves and getting engaged in conflicts with other nations. Is this sound to invest in the war instaed of peace , is this good to promote crisis against global solution, Is this moral to participate in unjust war instead providing solution and support to those in need, Are we getting closer to our own downfalls compare to other emerging nations? Still we are looking to see a great leader who can bring the unity in the world and can promote peace rather than hostality and crisis. Will we be able to see that grat leader who can talk like Ronald Regan or Lincoln and bring the value to our Oval office, Is there any one who will sit in the oval office and serve the entire nations and not to a specific lobbyst or ethnic groups? Can any leader lead us to the pa

2007-04-01 12:17:42 · 4 answers · asked by peace seeker 1 in Politics & Government Politics

4 answers

See now this question here is far more important that the ones about the war in Iraq and hopefully you understand why. Anyway, its a question of who we get to work toward building bridges the east.

2007-04-01 12:48:30 · answer #1 · answered by Theodore Sebastian 3 · 0 0

It might help if the US stopped dropping bombs on everyone that upset them.

The East getting ahead? Well they are doing it using exactly the same business philosophies that the West did, so whats the problem?

2007-04-01 12:24:25 · answer #2 · answered by philip_jones2003 5 · 0 0

Revaltions to Apocalypse!

2007-04-01 12:21:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The terrorists want to kill us, we need to stop them.

2007-04-01 12:22:30 · answer #4 · answered by bigsey93ortiz34 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers