It's been on here before, the likeness between the Communist and Democratic parties. It was really surprising!
2007-04-01 12:33:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Communism, in theory is a grand thing, everyone working together toward a common goal and existance. But a theory is just a theory and this one is full of flaws. Namely, it doesn't take into consideration the very nature of man. And that is to get ahead and be better than everyone else.
To that end, what you are actually describing is socialism, which is quickly what happens to communism when you add that human element. And yes, Hillary Clinton and her ilk are just that, socialists. They play the "It's not fair" card as if it were a trump -- no relation to Donald. They, if given their way, would gladly take away from those who've worked hard to get ahead and give to those who've done very little and certainly haven't earned priviledge. All in the name of "fairness." Trouble is, socialism, by its very nature undermines capitalism and in its place, promotes laziness and mediocrity. Why struggle to get ahead if, in the end, all is for naught because Hillary is going to take it all away from you and give it to those who didn't work as hard? We have a "Universal" education system. Unless you can aford to continue on to a higher level of education, what are you qualified to do upon graduation? Flip burgers for minimum wage? Minimum wage was never intended to do anyting more than wet the appetite of those in high school and help them get indoctrinated into the work force. Even if you have no childen, you are required to pay taxes into the education system. So, it's not really working for you. Can you just imagine what she's going to do (again -- HMO) with our health care? You aren't so academically inclined and have no financial resource to get you into one of those grand institutions of higher learning. What then? Your best bet is to hire into a factory. But no wait... Bill sent all of our labor jobs over seas with WTO and NAFTA. I guess all that leaves then is to either marry money (John "I don't remember what I did for Christmas in '68" Kerry) or enlist in the military and pray like hell that Hillary doesn't vote to send you're sorry butt off to war only to claim later that she was lied to and she's REALLY sorry that she wasn't bright enough to know that in war, people die. And also, that wars last more than 30 seconds... Yep, socialism. With any luck, you too can become 100% dependent upon the government. Social programs are nothing more than slavery without chains to bind you. If you want to be "Free," you must first break those chains that bind and you do that with money. The more money you have, the more options you have from which to choose. But then again, Hillary is doing everything she can to take that away from you...
2007-04-01 19:45:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Doc 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The idea that communism is in the USA is ridiculous. How many people avail themselves to public housing? Very few. Do you know anyone? I don't. Taxation? How do you expect us to pay for this damn war? Donations? What socialized medicine? No insurance, no medical care.
The list goes on and on but it's filled with lies.
2007-04-01 19:30:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7
·
1⤊
6⤋
I think you are confusing social responsibility with communism again! You crazy cons!
2007-04-01 19:22:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
7⤋