Female circumcision is bad, why do you ask?
2007-04-01 11:11:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frank R 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
This is similar to a question I asked a while back, but from what other people have said, and in reference to the comment about "most penises are circumsized"...most penises in America are circumcized but in other countries this isn't the case. So a wierd look from an American girl may not be a wierd look from someone of Hispanic descent or European or African. I think as long as you know how you use the equipment you have and a woman is satisfied, I'm pretty sure she's not going to care if you're circumsized or not unless you don't keep your penis and genitals clean regardless of whether you are circumcized or not.
2007-04-01 11:25:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by radioactive_babywipes 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Circumcision of infants carries significant risks and all medical authorities now say that these risks outweigh the dubious benefits of routine infant circumcision. Many men resent being circumcised, some so much that they stretch to try and regain some of their lost foreskin's function. They can never recover all the complex anatomy and lost nerve endings though.
Circumcision removes over half the skin of the penis (about 15 square inches in an adult) and it's not just simple skin. It's packed with nerve endings, special anatomical features like the ridged band and has a unique elastic gliding action, allowing it to slide on itself and act like lube. This action is what most males use to masturbate with except those who are cut so tightly that they have to use lube or just rub it dry. Of course the intact male has the option to use lube too if he wants to. During intercourse it acts like lube on entry and may act as a dam, preventing lubricating secretions escaping from the vagina. In one study women reported that sex with an intact partner was gentler and more satisfying since he doesn't have to thrust as hard to feel enough stimulation. Removing the foreskin turns the surface of the glans from an inner mucosal membrane to outside skin. Newly circumcised adults usually go through some weeks of intense discomfort as the glans is constantly exposed to rubbing on clothing, until it develops a thicker keratin layer and becomes less sensitive. A new study has shown real differences in fine touch sensitivity between circumcised and intact penises and that the most sensitive parts of the intact penis are those that would be removed by circumcision.
2007-04-02 00:13:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by GeoffB 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am sick and tired of females who answer the circumcision postings with "it looks nicer""it looks better" or neater.The stupidity of these answers just make me wonder if the females answering have any idea what happens to the penis after it has been mutilated.Would they have their own genitalia mutilated if a guy thought it would look prettier,neater,nicer or that it would be easier to clean?I don't think so,so,to all those air heads out there,please try to use what little brain that you do possess and think before you advocate the mutilation of men simply because it is aesthetically pleasing to you.The anti circumcision lobby always post details of surveys,doctors reports and other findings,including web sites,to back up their claims that circumcision is an unnecessary surgical procedure whereas the pro mutilation people only use the same worn out hackneyed phrases like "it looks nicer""his dad is mutilated so my son should be too".Think first cretins and to answer the question.It is bad and I don't give a sh*t what women like or don't like when it comes to my penis.If they don't like it then I will take my tackle to someone who doesn't care that I am not mutilated
2007-04-01 17:01:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends where you live.
In America women are used to circumcised ones, but most elsewhere (such as in Europe, Asia, and Latin America) they're used to uncircumcised ones. So in Europe a circumcised penis may shock someone, where as in the USA a intact one may shock someone. Either way, when erect they look similar; the major difference is when they're not erect.
Personally I'm uncircumcised and live in America and haven't had any problems with it, just as my friends haven't either, but that's because in our generation (I'm still a teenager) there's starting to be more uncircumcised guys, since more and more parents are leaving their sons uncircumcised, since they can always choose later if they wish (like for example, the West coast... California, Nevada, Washington) has low circumcision rates now, as low as 14%.
All sources are here, including circumcision disadvantages, such as effects on sensitivity (brand new study from this month):
http://forums.govteen.com/showpost.php?p=3069995&postcount=2
As the other poster said; enjoy what you have. Everyone's unique. =) I'm a moderator at a teenage site and some girls admit to thinking they wouldn't like an uncircumcised one, but after having a boyfriend with one, they liked it. AKA, most girls don't care once you're in a relationship, unless you don't shower or something, but that's another matter, since it only takes like five seconds to wash it. ;)
Anywho, when erect they look very similar.
2007-04-01 11:25:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jorge 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Circumcision is neither a bad or good thing. It is simply a matter of personal preference. Most women will not care one way or the other if she is with somebody she cares about. I have a personal preference for circumcised penises, but I would never let that get in the way of a relationship with a guy who is not circumcised.
2007-04-01 14:38:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by aqx99 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Circumcision is male genital mutilation. That makes it bad in my book.
A new study proves conclusively, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that circumcision decreases sensitivity for the man. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x
There is a difference between WOMEN and GIRLS in preferences. A full 90% of women say sex is better with an intact man. http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html Only inexperienced girls (who mostly think penises are gross anyway) think there is an advantage to having the penis whacked.
An intact man is just as clean as a cut one. If he washes his penis, it's clean, cut or intact. If he doesn't wash it, it's dirty, cut or intact.
2007-04-01 13:35:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Maple 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
circumcision is good if your not to clean, and bad if you want the best feeling in the act. you are less sensitive.
2007-04-01 11:33:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by chin 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because most penises are circumcised you might get an odd look when you take off your clothes for intercourse but some women thinks its hot (it really depends on the woman)
2007-04-01 11:15:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
neither are bad, but some girls prefer one or the other
2007-04-02 07:45:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋