English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-01 10:46:03 · 6 answers · asked by David H 6 in Sports Cricket

No answers. I can understand that. Its an impossible question to answer.

2007-04-01 10:54:28 · update #1

No answers. I can understand that. Its an impossible question to answer.

2007-04-01 10:54:43 · update #2

6 answers

Your guess is as good as mine! I think he's a highly over-rated cricketer. I'd have given the job to one of Trescothick, Flintoff,even Strauss or Collingwood. Vaughan shouldn't be in the team at all.

2007-04-01 11:13:52 · answer #1 · answered by doji star 2 · 0 0

i agree with the above answer
i think Michael vaughan should be dropped from the side and give the captancy to flintoff
bring back trescothick and strauss

2007-04-01 18:48:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First of all it was strange decision to include him in the team, leave alone captaincy without much match practice after recovering from injury and without judging his form.

2007-04-01 19:29:26 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

Because he is a very good player.

2007-04-01 22:20:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

he is the best man to lead

2007-04-02 08:34:30 · answer #5 · answered by john 7 · 0 0

simple........ he is the captain of the team.......

2007-04-01 19:03:51 · answer #6 · answered by vinit 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers