who in their right mind would be dumb enough to vote for hillary ?
do you not remember the scandals and crooked deals of the 90s . do you not remember how they discraced our whitehouse ? wake up America!
2007-04-01 08:56:28 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
People were dumb enough to vote for Bush. Hillary is several times brighter, more knowledgeable and more decent than Bush.
2007-04-01 09:01:44 · answer #1 · answered by quest for truth gal 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
You ask this question of people dumb enough to re-elect Bush?
I remember the 90s, I remember the scandals. I also recall that our country and our individuals were in better economical shape than in many years with the Clinton administration.
Each administration does good and bad, it depends on what you choose to focus on.
The Clintons may have disgracedd the whitehouse but, look at the evil tyrant with his in line veto running the white house into the ground.
Wanna be heard, VOTE!
2007-04-01 16:16:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh people are dumb enough. This one girl said on the Sean Hannity radio station that she would vote for Hillary just to have Clinton back in the administration how wrong is that. I mean you want someone that can run a country even if you don't agree with what party they are in.
2007-04-02 09:15:28 · answer #3 · answered by brittany s 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
People voted for Bush didn´t they? So there are a lot of people who would be dumb enough to vote for a bad president.
2007-04-05 09:23:14 · answer #4 · answered by Dave 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're kidding, right? bush getting elected TWICE wasn't enough? how can we worry aboutt scandlas from the 90's (most of which were completely made up), when we're hip deep in the messes created by this idiot in the white house? the big differences between the two administrations are that clinton's screwups were merely embarassing and tacky-the current clown in the oval office has, with his bungling, cost thousands of american lives, hundreds of thousands of iraqi lives (most of them civilians, a lot of those being innocent children), and trillions of our hard-earned tax dollars, much of that stolen by his crooked pals and the crooked pals of his cronies-he took the largest budget surplus in history and turned it into the largest deficit in history...the rest of the world is either laughing at us or openly contemptuous of us, except the two pip-squeak 4th world dictatorships we attacked...our military is stretched so thin that our state department feels obligated to attempt acutal diplomacy since our military doesn't have the capacity to fight an ACTUAL country with a REAL military...can you name a SINGLE department or agency that HASN'T managed to either blow its mission entirely, keep its top people out of court, completely mismanage the resources budgeted to them or some combination of the three? this administration is easily the most ideological, least competent, most power hungry, most secretive (when convenient-they don't mind leaking classifed info to suit their ideological purposes) and most corrupt administration of all time...
2007-04-01 18:39:17 · answer #5 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The same person that believes she will do anything about the healthcare reform she is spouting about. Doesn't anybody remember when Slick Willy won his second term he appointed her to lead heathcare reform. So why is she going to do something about it 12 years after she had the power? Probably because she won't do squat like she did the first time! Typical politician, say anything to get a vote. She maybe able to convince New Yorkers but she won't convince the whole country.
2007-04-01 16:19:06 · answer #6 · answered by REFORM! 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yep!
I'll post this here too.
Just because one can raise millions doesn't mean they are the better candidate. What it means is that favors are repaid and more secrets are kept well hidden...
Hip pocket endorsements are nothing more than hidden scandals and payoffs to keep well kept secrets that would destroy one's public image.
The Clintons should do well in the fund raising department.
2007-04-01 16:18:47 · answer #7 · answered by Stealth 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The dumb vote went to Bush.
2007-04-01 16:03:29 · answer #8 · answered by notyou311 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
And she was involved exactly how?
She would be / is (?) running on her record as a Sentor of NY State.
Now, being as I'm not an American...vote for whomever floats your boat...but if you don't vote, don't vent!
2007-04-01 16:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by jcurrieii 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Not me!
Although I doubt they can win, I like Duncan Hunter, MItt Romney, or Tom Tancredo the best
2007-04-01 16:09:43 · answer #10 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋