Also consider that a processor can be rated for one speed and run at a lower speed. The real life speed would then be different from the rated speed. Over-clocking is running faster than rated speed. It is generally not recommended. It shortens the life of the processor. All the speeds listed have been used at one time. In my case, I am running a processor rated at 200 MHz on one machine, 166 MHz on another machine and 3.2 GHz on another machine. My hand-held unit is so old that it doesn't have a rating. It's just slow.
2007-04-01 08:27:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jack 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Out of the speed you've listed, here are the "real & existent" ones :
1 GHz | 2 GHz | 3 GHz | 3.20 GHz
You normally don't find "x.5 GHz" speed ratings, unless the processor has been overclocked.
2007-04-01 15:13:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by GH0$T 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They all exist or existed, Ghost is wrong about no 500 MHz, perhaps too young or too old to know Pentium III 500 MHz existed, the minimum is about 1 MHz for a '70 era machine.
Why did you list real ones and ask if they are real when they all are real?
2007-04-01 15:20:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andy T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
About about this. Here's a chart of a few cpus on the market, with the real speed (nothing to do with the GHz).
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html
2007-04-01 15:15:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by computertech82 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You've listed CPU speeds and ask what the real-life speeds are? I don't understand what you want?
Ask the question again but try explaining more clarly what you are looking for
2007-04-01 15:11:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by bambamitsdead 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
real-life speeds are measured in MIPS (millions of instructions per secound), u better contact the manufacturer, coz MIPS differ from model to model
2007-04-01 15:18:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What are you asking?!!?
2007-04-01 15:13:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by scooter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋