English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We were told that the victims at the pentagon could be identified by fingerprints and DNA, yet at WTC, the fires melted steel.

What kind of fire is that ? It melts steel at WTC on 9/11 but not human bodies at Pentagon...

That's a funny fact in the commission report...

Source:
Official Commission Report on 9/11

2007-04-01 07:17:32 · 10 answers · asked by Amelie 3 in Politics & Government Politics

Goldenrae: Thanks for asking. I am an engineer of profession.

2007-04-01 07:25:25 · update #1

To "blahblah": you see, most of the kerosene burned upon impact (with the second tower) - you can see the big ball of fire. So there wasn't much fuel left to burn anyway since it burned already.
.

2007-04-01 07:27:29 · update #2

Soloviceus: You didn't answer the question :)

2007-04-01 07:29:42 · update #3

Lance: You must use more credible sources that "LIFE" since your life may not be verified by others, hence you have no proof yet.
And btw, after WTC fell.. it didn't burned for weeks.. lol what the hell =)

2007-04-01 07:31:56 · update #4

10 answers

To me there was always something wrong with the pentagon story. The government kept everyones attention on the WTC that at times the other 2 planes that crashed where not even mentioned. Like it never happened.

2007-04-01 07:53:25 · answer #1 · answered by cheryl l 3 · 1 0

Not so funny. The Pentagon incident involved the collapse of only 5 or 6 floors and the fire was able to be fought and brought under control. The WTC fires burned uninhibited for almost an hour before over 100 floors collapsed into a pile which itself burned for weeks. You have to use your mind when people present pieces of information that seem to support their idiotic theories.

2007-04-01 14:28:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The damage to the pentagon was in a segment fo the structure, the majority had little damage. The WTC burned with jet fuel for a long time then collapsed on itself. It's not that strange to think that bodies in the pentagon would be easier to recover and identify.

2007-04-01 14:27:36 · answer #3 · answered by soloviceus 2 · 1 1

...Before using any device be absolutely sure to wipe it clear of all fingerprints. Do not assume the device burning will get rid of fingerprints. The authorities have at least 32 methods of pulling prints of burned articles. In some cases, the fire actually fuses the oil of the print to object, making it easier to read...

2007-04-01 14:51:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The fire at the WTC was just a little bit bigger than the one at the Pentagon since you didn't seem to notice.

2007-04-01 14:22:09 · answer #5 · answered by blahblah 4 · 0 1

Very interesting, I will have to check the commission report again. Thanks for the heads up.

2007-04-01 14:22:01 · answer #6 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 1 0

look BLAME IT ON BUSH...everyone else blames everything from the weather to bad bedroom performance...and besides itl make you look good with the pelosi/reid regime.

2007-04-01 14:27:30 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 2

And you are an engineer? A physicist?

2007-04-01 14:20:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I don't understand it. if there is a logical explanation I havn't read it

2007-04-01 14:24:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

OK - I'll keep this in mind...

2007-04-01 14:22:10 · answer #10 · answered by SuperCityRob 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers