We never had a woman president before, so who knows... maybe it could help us out...?
2007-04-01 06:57:33 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, for most people sex is not the issue at all. Hillary Clinton is a socialist, and there arn't any alternatives out there right now. So if there were options I think that sex wouldn't be that big of a deal.
Even tho it's not politically correct to say it. Men and woman are differant in many ways. Woman (on the whole) see things through emotion more that the hard cold facts. Each has its goodside and badside. But one could argue that hard cold facts are easier to deal with when in office for something as important as the Presidency...
The ol' woman PMS'ing with her finger on a nuke button cliche'...
2007-04-01 07:05:36 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. X 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Maybe not that one here is why!!
"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - June 28, 2004, in San Francisco at a Democrat Party fundraiser)
"I want to take those profits and put them into an alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 2, 2007, at DNC Winter Meeting - regarding profits earned by oil companies, which are not [yet] owned by the government)
"As president I know I can't kill, jail or occupy every nation we don't agree with and I cannot just wish that all the terrorists be wiped off the face of the Earth" (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 10, 2007, at a campaign appearance in New Hampshire)
"We're going to change the way we finance the system by taking away money from people who are doing well now" — (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton — March 24, 2007, at a health care forum in Las Vegas)
ne! here is why,
2007-04-01 14:06:27 · answer #2 · answered by mark k 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't disagree with having a woman president, The Iron lady Margret Thatcher, Prime Minister of Great Britian was awesome., I just don't want the one currently running.
2007-04-01 14:01:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Maybe, but only if its someone who is qualified. I vote on the person and thier talents/abilities, not their gender. I haven't seen any female candidates yet that I think can do the job. And that's coming from a woman.
2007-04-01 14:02:24 · answer #4 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
So along those way of thinking. I should vote for anyone who looks like me, makes sense. I am a young white American Male (the most hated people on the planet) maybe I should voter for a young white man.
2007-04-01 14:02:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Problem is that there are no truly qualified women running for president of the United States. Maybe when one that I think IS qualified throws her hat in the ring, I will consider voting for her.
2007-04-01 14:00:33 · answer #6 · answered by Johnny Conservative 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
To me, being a woman is secondary, but we are far behind the times in the U.S. as far as having women leaders. We've been waiting for a long time for a strong qualified woman candidate to emerge and we have one - Sen. Hillary Clinton.
2007-04-01 14:09:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Ya, that's great. Pick the leader based on such important factors as sex or race. Who cares how they stand on the issues.
The fall of Rome is about to repeat.
2007-04-01 14:06:26 · answer #8 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What America needs is a proper President, one that has a real brain.
2007-04-01 14:09:28 · answer #9 · answered by Barrie G 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I just can't imagine a woman PMS' ing, near the (Red Phone). LOL
2007-04-01 14:43:25 · answer #10 · answered by gypsyworks 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋