English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

depends on how literally you take the bible...

If you believe it 100% then sure why not...

even preists say it's stories to help guide our lives and shouldn't be taken literally though...

In reality...no

There is evidence of major floods and I'm sure there was a noah and I'm sure he had a boat and had his familiy and his own livestock on a boat and survived a flood....

but two of every animal? how did he get a kangaroo on board or a tazmanian devil which are only found in australia...or a polar bear....

the point is get the moral of the story, don't take it all like it's absolute fact. then your missing the point.

2007-04-01 04:10:49 · answer #1 · answered by Justin H 4 · 0 0

I believe he took animals but not insects, because insects have eggs and larvae that survive anything; they will survive a nuclear war or anything....plus, there were probably some hanging onto the fur of the animals...[fleas]

2007-04-01 11:11:00 · answer #2 · answered by bollin772000 2 · 0 0

If God wanted two of every animal and insect, then he had the power to do it. God can do anything.The ark is on Mt. Ararat, buried in the snow. No one is allowed on the mountain. There have been arial pictures, but no search teams.

2007-04-01 12:51:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

first its ark. no, noah didnt bring unicorns, mermaids, or any mystical creature like that because the did not believe him, when noah said that there was going to be a flood and the only safe place was in the ark.

2007-04-01 11:17:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anon omus 5 · 0 0

No, that myth was borrowed by the Jews. The real (mythical) character was Gil-gamesh.

2007-04-01 12:25:34 · answer #5 · answered by Amphibolite 7 · 0 0

if noah was RNA, and his ark was DNA, then yes, he brought every single living thing with him.

2007-04-01 11:31:12 · answer #6 · answered by gryphen 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers