Libs love peace, and that is respectable, but sometimes it is not the answer to a global crisis.
The libs only answer to a threat to national security is to call our comander in cheif a chimp. It's almost traitorous.
God bless our elected officials, let them not be sidetracked by liberal moonbats.
2007-03-31 18:46:45 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am a 23 year old veteran of the Iraq war, and I am extremely liberal. NOT Democrat. Liberal. As a matter of fact, almost all of my Army buddies are dems and libs as well.
A person does not have to be a conservative to understand the ideals of honor, integrity, and service to country. So get that out of your head.
Our commander and chief is a chimp!
2007-03-31 18:51:40 · answer #1 · answered by Harry 5 · 14⤊ 2⤋
Unlike you, you're bravely sitting on your butt and whining, like your Dumbya. As for chimp, just look at it. It's an insult to chimps, he looks like puke. The treason is outing a CIA operative and sending 3200+ soldiers to die for your private interests and to the serious harm to the national defense. You may be a retard and believe there were WMD or any of the vomit Dumbya sort-of says (you know how retarded his English is), but there are people with brains in theis country, too.
2007-04-01 20:46:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I answer like this. Thai Chi makes use of the combatants capacity antagonistic to them. in the adventure that they are stupid adequate to get that close, i am going to shove them to the floor and characteristic them kiss the floor. choose i ought to ignore about it, yet my celebration is this. those HEEL-IES. There a reason on why on feet. Sill, they were banned by technique of a customary One. even if I genuinely have a diverse Chain of Command now. I see it like this... i ought to ignore concerning the knowledge of those orders, on the grounds that God is my president now. A customary, i ought to wish, has the capacity to assert, "you comprehend what" you do not prefer to pass in this submit, turn decrease back. i'm one in each and every of those fortunate ones. i'm nevertheless in Limbo like such extremely some VETS accessible. I practice a code of silence on the grounds that others were waiting years, if no longer having to wrestle the VA( VETS AFFAIRS) to get any incapacity. "tousled" in spite of this, like this: "AF guy in a the military city." including: no prefer to be a Ninja, on the grounds that I practice this theory: i am going to apply the hi Ten Mitsuraigai FS antagonistic to them. it is one it is a million strike and kill. If I do use such, then I see it like this: they seem a Darwin Award and that i'm doing a service for all humanity. Samurai X or the Hitokarai Batosai... Pulling out a Pistol. strong they realized that a pistol is a device to kill, yet there theory is harsh, no. Myself, in the adventure that they insisted i ought to face aside, yet nevertheless shove them for being that DUMB! TC, GB A, and would the Swartz be with you mainly! :D
2016-12-03 02:40:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are Democrats who volunteer to defend our country, so you are wrong there...
I love peace, but if we have to go to war, it is for the reason YOU actually used in your question - TO DEFEND. We went to Afghanistan, and that was fine. We were attacked, and the country who helped should pay for it.
You don't like bush being called a chimp? Ok, how about a CRIMINAL. He lied about this war, and he and his Administration has been caught doing criminal acts.
By the way, where are the Republicans in office who voted for this war? Are they fighting as well? NO. What about their children? NO. It's fine for them to risk other lives, but not their own or their family.
2007-03-31 18:55:32 · answer #4 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Please back up your claim that it is young republicans out there fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Anyone can claim anything but that doesn't make it true.
What is true that that neither the great majority of democrats or republicans in congress (or the president!) have sent their sons and daughters to fight.
Most of those fighting our wars abroad are working class kids who can't afford college. Socio-economic conditions are probably a much better predictor of who is serving in our military than party affiliation.
2007-03-31 19:08:14 · answer #5 · answered by Sithara B 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Wow.
I served in the Army,and have been in combat.
Every generation of my family,since the Civil war,have served(the first of us in this country joined the Union Army two months after he arrived here from Germany in 1863).
And we have always been Liberals.
And my son will probably serve when he becomes an adult.
2007-03-31 18:57:21 · answer #6 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
You seem to convienently forget all the names that Republicans/conservatives have called Democratic presidents over the years. How about when Rush Limbaugh constantly opened his radio program proclaiming "Day X of America held hostage" during the Clinton years?
The conservatives have been just as bad, if not worse.
2007-03-31 18:52:29 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
What's not to like about calling him a "chimp"? Chimps are a little gross, but they're humorous, expressive little creatures. They make me laugh. Besides, didn't you have a name you called Clinton while he was president?
2007-03-31 19:28:51 · answer #8 · answered by asterisk 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There you go again...generalizing! Many of our service people are Democrats, Liberals, Hispanic, Black, etc. etc.
Our CIC is not a chimp. Chimps make people laugh! Bush is making me cry.
And how was Iraq a threat to our national security????
2007-03-31 18:51:33 · answer #9 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 10⤊ 2⤋
my god,when was Iraq a threat to the united states?its pres.chimp who got us into this no win situation in Iraq.btw just when did you take a survey of who is a re-pug and who is a liberal joining the military.
2007-03-31 18:56:08 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋