I'm NOT looking for "Breach of Contract" I know what that is... this is something different.
When two people have a signed agreement and then one person tries to add onto the agreement after it was signed.
I hope that makes sense...
Thanks
2007-03-31 18:27:28 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Breaking a signed agreement is breach of contract. That is the proper legal term.
What you are talking about is an attempted amendment to a contract, which may or may not be allowed depending on the terms in the original contract. But attempting to amend a contract is not breaking (or breaching) the contract.
You may be thinking of an "integration clause" which says that the contract is the complete expression between the parties, and anything said on the side doesn't count. Most integration clauses also require any amendments to be written and signed by both parties.
2007-03-31 18:32:56 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What you just discribed is Breach of contract.
you can look into Parole evidence also, this are statements or terms not included in the written agreement....
Or you maybe thinking of Integration of contract.
2007-04-02 16:18:56 · answer #2 · answered by luxlugger 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Breach..
2007-04-01 01:34:35 · answer #3 · answered by meander 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the type of contract/agreement. real estate, financial, etc...
2007-04-01 01:36:29 · answer #4 · answered by CJ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's called an "Amendment", still both parties have to agree to it.
2007-04-01 01:37:05 · answer #5 · answered by Diver4u2 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean a codicil?
2007-04-01 01:35:17 · answer #6 · answered by hop0409 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋