English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think this might change Bush's idea of sending more troops to fight a loosing situation? An illegal situation that never should have been started in the first place?

2007-03-31 17:51:05 · 18 answers · asked by Surfer Dude 2 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

Yes, but Cheney, Rove and Rice must go too.

2007-03-31 17:55:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

The reason why Bush is keeping our soldiers in Iraq is to stop Al Qaeda from making Iraq into another safe haven for terrorists. He's said that that is the reason, many times. If we left Iraq tommorow without stopping the insurgency, the terrorists would use Iraq as a hideout to launch a second terrorist attack on America. They would crash a plane into a nuclear plant and kill 7'000'000 Americans, and the civil warfare would quickly kill all 6'000'000 residents of Baghdad.

Therefore, SUPPORT VICTORY IN IRAQ, NOT FAILURE.

2007-04-01 01:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by bionicleis2cool117 1 · 1 0

No, But I think that Clinton and Hilary should take their daughter there and stay until we hit them with a bomb. You maybe should go with them if you think that this was President Bush's fault. Do you remember we were attacked on 9-11? Do you believe everything the Media tells you? I bet that if you would have had family that was in the buildings or on the planes on 9-11 you would not be talking this way. I remember when we were attacked EVERYONE in America was screaming war, now they all act like they don't know why we are over there fighting. WAKE UP!!

2007-04-01 00:59:19 · answer #3 · answered by gigi 5 · 1 3

I'm pretty sure the daughters are working for the peace corps in Africa right now, which is likely more noble than anything you are doing.

Did you also want to send Chelsea Clinton to Somalia? Perhaps you should take a 3 week vacation from typing. Then your brain would have a chance to catch up with your fingers.

2007-04-01 00:58:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Only if Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea go to Bosnia and Kosovo. Bush has been to Iraq plenty of times. Oh, and here's a little tip: the surge has been effective so far.

2007-04-01 00:55:30 · answer #5 · answered by DOOM 7 · 4 1

Yeah, great idea, and give him a gun so he can serve a tour of duty there. It would be no huge loss if he was killed. Laura and the daughters didn't do anything, leave them home.

2007-04-01 01:10:27 · answer #6 · answered by Malvon L 1 · 0 1

Uneducated opinion. Forced, like the way you try to force your convoluted theories on everyone.

2007-04-01 00:56:48 · answer #7 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 4 1

I think sending them to Fallujah would be a much better place. And, make sure they visit all the Sunni tourist traps ;)

2007-04-01 00:59:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

No, but I think you should be forced to move there permanently, Nancy.

2007-04-01 00:54:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I think that's a lovely idea. I also understand that it is really, really safe to walk about in the streets if you're an American.

No military escorts though. They have to understand that as well.

2007-04-01 00:57:21 · answer #10 · answered by ThatsThinkingWithUR Dipstick 3 · 2 4

Do I think your a crazy liberal ummm yes! Do you not realize that Democrats voted for the war as well

2007-04-01 00:54:35 · answer #11 · answered by Calvin T 2 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers