land developers should be physically restrained from developing undeveloped land until such time that all the unused developed land is reclaimed and redeveloped. all the old strip centers and vacant neighborhoods, condemned projects etc.
2007-04-01 14:54:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Norman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yah it should start out at a low number just to get everyone on board. Then raise the percentage every year. Guess it would depend on what they were building, too.
They could also do something where, if they exceeded the proposed time it took to develop, increase the number of trees by X. I'd hate to use the word penalty, but that's basically what it'd be.
2007-04-01 00:51:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by truthyness 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hel* yes or leave the hard woods instead of coming in and just flattening it clean.
If they plant new trees they should be good quality and good size not stick trees
2007-04-01 00:00:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Did you know in Florida that developers can buy a special permit to kill burrowing turtles? They buy the permit and then run their bulldozers through and compact the earth and bury the turtles alive. It takes a reptile months to die that way. It is just revolting.
2007-04-01 00:01:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think it is a grand idea. Of course where I live it is trees everywhere and they were not planted by humans.
2007-04-01 00:00:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by sideways 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What is the percentage now? In BC I think the percentage is pretty high. I'm not sure though.
2007-04-01 00:02:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by 1K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2007-04-01 00:02:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by IndiHippi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. There would be too many trees at the mall.
2007-03-31 23:58:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Just For Fun 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I wish they would so much way to many missing around here.
2007-04-01 00:00:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by canuticklemepink 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes they should and more would help.
2007-04-01 00:00:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by thmsnbrgll 5
·
1⤊
0⤋