Japan's invasion of Manchuria demonstrated the growing political power of:
D. the Japanese military
2007-04-01 16:34:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by WMD 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
D.-I don't completely absolve the emperor or cabinet of blame, but the invasion of Manchuria was mostly the doing of the Japanese Imperial Army. In my opinion to say the "military" is sort of simplistic, but that is the best choice here. Manchuria was the army's show, the Imperial Navy would later play "catch up" when it came to aggression at Pearl Harbour.
2007-03-31 23:33:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by michinoku2001 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931, I believe. Examine who was ruling Japan at that time. Was it a communist nation? Imperial (ie. run by an emperor)? Militaristic? Democratic? Once you know that, you'll know the answer.
2007-03-31 22:30:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Come on in, the water's lovely 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
d - after the Edo period in Japan, the emperor become more and more isolated from day-to-day military decisions,. his role was that of a spiritual father rather than a leader. For more detailed information on Asian history - particularly that of Japan and China - some of the most in-depth sources are the University of Chicago, University of California - Stanford. These have some of the largest collections of research, diaries, law studies, etc.
2007-03-31 22:35:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by jan b 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
d. the military, by this time the prime minister and emperor were taking a back seat to Tojo and his militarist nationalists, and the communist party was a total non-entity until after WWII, but even then it never gained a significant following in Japan.
2007-04-01 21:37:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by David M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
D. The military
2007-04-01 06:54:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by bryan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The military.
Jonnie
2007-03-31 22:31:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jonnie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
military
2007-03-31 22:30:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋