English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You can really go either way one this question and personally it's tough to decide but I don't think either should be fired this year but I do think the Pacers need to stop relying on the draft in the offseason and sign free agents. I am sorry but I am from Indianapolis and the people of Indiana are frustrated with the fact that even with us being the basketball capital of the world we still don't have an NBA Chapionship in this state, it's like one of the Canadien NHL teams not having a NHL Championship, it's just wrong. What do you think?

2007-03-31 12:19:50 · 4 answers · asked by Thomas C 4 in Sports Basketball

Wow Hi, thank you for you jerk off comment. The Pacers won two ABA Titles before the NBA bought them and since then they have been one of the top five teams to consitently make the playoffs in all of the NBA so don't ever tell me they won't win. I guaruntee you now just like I gaurnteed that the Colts would win 2 or more Super Bowls when Bill Polian joined the Colts that the Pacers WILL win an NBA Championship within the next ten years.

2007-03-31 12:47:43 · update #1

4 answers

It's Bird's fault, he doesn't even know what kind of team he wants, what kind of players to get. Yes they pulled a big trade this season, but has it really benefitted the Pacers?

2007-03-31 14:14:22 · answer #1 · answered by mikcute 2 · 0 0

That's an easy question. Is is more Larry Bird's fault than Rick's. Larry has done a horrible job acquiring players. You have to give the coach some players if you want him to win.

2007-03-31 19:37:21 · answer #2 · answered by BAN 2 · 0 0

Neither, Indiana didn't win before they got there, so who's at fault is irrelevant. Indiana just doesn't have the players to compete. They never have and probally never will.

2007-03-31 19:41:19 · answer #3 · answered by Hi 7 · 0 1

Bird's

2007-03-31 19:39:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers