Answer in a hurry, because this question has already been removed once.
2007-03-31 11:29:45 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
So far, I'm impressed. Glad to know there are some intelligent people out there.
I wonder why the question was pulled originally.
2007-03-31 11:39:24 · update #1
In the US, you'd have to start by throwing out the Constitution.
Which makes sense -- no fascist tyranny would want anything that provides any civil liberties or public rights, or imposes any limitations on what they can do.
And the only ones afraid of questions are the tyrants and the fascists and those so scared of opposition that they react violently to anyone who disagrees with them.
I don't choose to live in a fascist dictatorship. But those who do are welcome to leave the US and take over some other tyranny and see who is better at suppressing freedom.
2007-03-31 11:32:58 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know, right after 9/11 most (over 50%) of Americans said that it should be a crime to criticize the President of the United States.
It's funny the effect that day had on the mindset of many Americans. Thank God it has since worn off.
But to answer your question, no.
2007-03-31 18:40:47 · answer #2 · answered by bartmcqueary 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if I enjoyed being a slave. The only purpose for banning the questioning of govenment activity
is to prevent people from discovering the criminal activity of government employees. It is just a logical step down the path to enslaving the populace. It ranks right alongside disarming citizenry as an effective means of enslaving them.
2007-03-31 18:33:24 · answer #3 · answered by thexrayboy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you think people from all over the world want to live here. Because we have the right , No we have the duty to question the Government. They work for us, at least they are supposed to.
2007-03-31 18:35:54 · answer #4 · answered by redd headd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Imagine a band of heavily armed religious zealots out on a cruise who stumble upon a land of milk and honey. It is already owned by others but "God" told the zealots to slaughter all the inhabitants and steal their land and live in it. As time went on they grew and grew and stole more and more land and even brought slaves from far away places to work the land for them because they were to lazy to work it themselves. Eventually the fanatics divided from the motherland and created their own country. As the guns got bigger and better they took more and more land. To justify all this they named their victims "Insurgents" or "Terrorists" or "Illegal Aliens" because "God" was on the fanatics side and everything they did was right. They even have a "Department of Justice". They even sing a little song
"This land is your land,
This land is my land,
This land was made for you and me."
So, in the name of "Justice", should the fanatics be required to return the land they stole?
Long Live Aztlan!
2007-03-31 18:31:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, I wouldn't.
This country was founded on the idea that questioning your government should be allowed (even promoted, when necessary).
2007-03-31 18:32:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seig heil, mein Fuehrer!
2007-03-31 18:37:03 · answer #7 · answered by St N 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I am very against it.
2007-03-31 18:32:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely not
2007-03-31 18:33:44 · answer #9 · answered by einzelgaenger08 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-03-31 18:31:43 · answer #10 · answered by jim_2ooo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋