We all know he has experience with dealing with Iran and hostages! LOL
2007-03-31 10:08:32 · 9 answers · asked by NO SOUP 4 U! 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LOL.... HAHAH YEAH RITE!!!
JIMMY WOULD GET THOSE POOR MARINES AND SAILORS KILLED!!!!
YOU JUST MADE MY DAY!!!!
THANKS!!!
2007-03-31 10:12:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
actually Carter did negotiate the release of the Iranian hostages in 1980-81,, but Bush the father took the credit for their release,,, true to the Bush fashion,, Bush the son wants to blame Clinton for his mistakes,,,,
2007-03-31 18:16:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we'll wind up with the same sort of deal he made for us in 1994 when negotiating the nuclear deal with Korea.
2007-03-31 17:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by jdkilp 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hold your tongue, nobody wants those British sailors and marines to spend a couple of years in captivity in Iran.
2007-03-31 17:14:41 · answer #4 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If we get Jimmy Carter to do it, it may end up in another fiery fiasco in the middle of the desert....
For that matter, it's not even an American problem...I'd say let the Brit's figure it out for themselves. (albeit I do believe the Brit's were outside Iranian territory when they were captured).
2007-03-31 17:12:52 · answer #5 · answered by Charlie Bravo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How about we start to nuke one Iranian city per day, until they release the hostages?
2007-03-31 17:19:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, and it took 444 days and the election of Ronald Reagan to get them released! Carter's attempt to hire someone who claimed they knew how to do it, failed miserably. Notice, he hasn't said anything.
2007-03-31 17:12:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
At least he can sit with Ahmadinajahd and they can deny the holocaust together.
2007-03-31 17:18:10 · answer #8 · answered by ruttster 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No! The US does not want to lose its best ally!
2007-03-31 17:12:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋