welfare,goverment supplied healthcare, emminent domain,taking assets from the wealthy, religous persicution. looks troubling.
2007-03-31 09:40:16 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Agree...what reasonable person, no matter how humble their means would want such!
...Not working in other countries, so why does anyone think it would work Here?
...I can tell you that if the Senators had to live on our salaries, receive our Social security retirement and Medicare, they probably wouldn't be so anxious to
"RUIN" our world!
2007-03-31 09:58:54 · answer #1 · answered by Rada S 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, that's obviously propaganda. We already have government supplied health care for the indigent and the elderly - why not the middle class? Eminent domain has been around since the conception of this country - see Constitution. Taking assets from the wealthy - not likely considering that democrats when compared to republicans have on average a higher net worth. Separation of church and state is not religious persecution. Grow up.
2007-03-31 15:36:55 · answer #2 · answered by CHARITY G 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A large percentage of Democrats are liberals and, of course, want socialism. Both Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama are liberals, so if either gets elected in 2008, America will edge closer to a socialist state. Already, America is about 40% socialist, so just a little push in the 'leftwardly' direction will push us over the edge and then our Consitution will be essentially trashed.
2007-03-31 09:57:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No ... I think you are confusing social justice for socialism. I'll admit that there are a lot of losers in the Democratic party but less so than the greedpublicans. Both parties need new and real leadership, common sense, and personal integrity. The people should demand and create a hybrid third party whose platform would include social justice, personal responsibility,real environmental stewardship, complete separation of church and state, adherence to the constitution, less government intrusion in our personal lives, fiscal responsibility,etc etc etc The question could be why not have this third party that represents the best values of both parties?
2007-03-31 09:59:38 · answer #4 · answered by Throwing Stones 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Attached is a link to the socialists party website, it lists all of the registered socialists in the Dem party. There are also communist websites and they list who they support.
So I think your question is moot, the Dem party is a socialist organization, not certain all of their lemmings are though.
2007-04-01 01:08:16 · answer #5 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better than what the GOP promised us over the last 12 years.
2007-03-31 20:39:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
So you want to stop all of that Corporate Welfare that Bush has passed out over the last six years?
And you don't think its right for "wealthy" Republicans making over a million dollars a year to pay taxes on it?
What religioius persecution?
It seems to me that Bush is persecuting the Gay and Lesbians as it is!
2007-03-31 09:57:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
They like the ideas but don't want to call it socialism.People have gotten lazy and want everything handed to them and can't see working harder or going back to school to get a better education for the better job.
2007-03-31 09:49:01 · answer #8 · answered by Fly Boy 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
If a socialist government is not what they want than no one can really be sure what they do want.
2007-03-31 09:48:52 · answer #9 · answered by Barack O Bankrupt 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course they do -- they are socialists
Give them all your money -- they know how to spend it better than you do anyway
There are unemployed people watching plasma tv's with 16 children who need your money
2007-03-31 09:47:05 · answer #10 · answered by Bill in Kansas 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋