Number One: there was no plane. It was a missle. Here are some very good web sites to answer your questions:
www.911review.org/Wiki/flight_93_movie.html
www.glennbeck.com./news/05172002.shtml
http://hardtruth.topcities.com/wake_up_america.html
www.brasschecktv.com/page/92.html
This last site is about the fake moon landing:
http://batesmotel.8m.com
Also: google more sites on this topic. You will find a lot of information.
2007-03-31 10:57:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by elecampane2 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh, brother...I'm not a physics professor, but I'm guessing it has something to do with velocity. An analogy follows:
You're driving in a car with metal fins sticking out of the sides (just go with me for a minute here), that are each about the width of the car. Let's say of the total mass of your wishful flying driving machine, the actual car and passengers are about 80pct or 90 pct.
OK, you hit 100 mph and smash into the side of a building. What happens? First, your velocity is concentrated on the central axis of the vehicle...whatever is at the center of gravity will travel the farthest. This, conversely, means that the wings you had (for whatever reason) welded to your car get immediately sheared off and smashed to the side of the vehicle.
The fast you go, the more that wing effect happens: the edges furthest away from the center of gravity just disintegrate on impact and only the heaviest/central portion of the object continues its momentum.
Or, if you want to try this at home: take a piece of wood and drill a 1/2" hole into it, then mold a mound of clay into a cylinder about 4" wide and smash it into the hole. Now, I know there wasn't a hold in the building already, but hopefully you get the idea: a lot of the wreckage ended up on the ground as the edges furthest away from the central axis were sheared off/disengrated on impact.
I'm oversimplifying, I know, but this is more of a Scully case than a Mulder (unless there was a UFO that I missed here)...
2007-03-31 16:37:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Do you think that the jets that hit the World Trade Center were 125 feet wide? The width of the cabin is only about twelve feet wide. The winspan is only about 112 feet.
Did you ever see a baseball go through a window? Did it leave a perfectly round four inch hole?
Look, you are intitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.
2007-03-31 16:51:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Scientist, Physics Professors, Structural Engineers, Employees from Under writers Laboratory, The Architects that designed and built the World Trade Centers and other professionals in the field...all saying that explosives were pre-planted in the buildings and was the cause of their collapse. Google Physics 911...Just look at all the web sites there are to choose from!
2007-03-31 16:48:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Surfer Dude 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Actually there were plenty of Air Plane parts on the inside open part of the Pentagon.
If the plane is flying at 500mph or whatever speed it was doing. The fuselage would make the hole and the wings would collapse back and continue through the hole.
2007-03-31 16:30:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bubba 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
Now take that hollow 125 foot plane fill with with fuel and get it up to 500 mph and hit a reinforced concrete building. You will have a different result. This is not wily E coyote here.
You're not very bright are you? No the hole would NOT be bigger. It would be smaller.
2007-03-31 16:28:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
It was a plane. My brother watched it fly into the Pentagon. I don't care what these lieberals tell you, my brother saw it all and I'll believe him over any lieberal or conspiracy any day!
2007-03-31 19:31:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
When I burn a 8 foot pile of brush the ash doesn't fill up a 2 gal. bucket. Why? The answer to my question to you is the answer to your question.
2007-03-31 16:33:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mother 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
Bill said the same thing about Hillary Boo ya!
2007-03-31 16:28:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by bugeyes 4
·
6⤊
2⤋
Oh...JD
Too funny. Your responses are usually not at their level but once in a while you just gotta slap one of them.
2007-03-31 16:30:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by thewindywest 5
·
4⤊
2⤋