2007-03-31 08:11:59 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
NO, they suffer from imbicelic, moronic behavior syndrome!~!
2007-03-31 08:42:43 · answer #1 · answered by Hunter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you talking about the United States government's "conspiracy theory?" The events as provided by the commission report would defy Newtonian physics and would indeed make good material for an X-Files episode.
The 9/11 commission report is riddled with missing and incorrect information. There was no eye-witness testimony taken. There was no explanation for what happened to the 47 column internal support structure that had to have been cut before the building would collapse at free fall speed without leaving the support structure in place.
You must be a naive conservative soldier in our "war of terror" to believe that the United States did not hear about the impending attacks or could not stop it.
2007-03-31 08:26:07 · answer #2 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Interesting analogy.
The point of the X-Files is that, despite common belief, many of the conspiracies were actually real and valid. And many of the myths had actual concrete existence.
So, by your analogy, you are saying the 9/11 conspiracy theory may be valid, just not yet sufficiently proven?
2007-03-31 08:18:46 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm pretty sure they were born after X-File TV show ended. And I don't think they know any history prior to 2001 either.
2007-04-03 21:50:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If 911 was "NOT" in the works with Clinton, then maybe you could possibly believe that Bush is that Bent....
....but ....do you think Clinton and Bush were in cahoots!...
...if so, I have worked with psych patients and , quite frankly medication might help you!!!
2007-03-31 08:25:51 · answer #5 · answered by Rada S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are in the X-Files fan club.
2007-03-31 08:17:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm making a bundle selling them tin foil fezzes (made from the finest foil,btw).
2007-03-31 08:15:34 · answer #7 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That is as logical an explanation as I have seen!
2007-03-31 08:44:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, they have proof positive that cigarette smoking man was involved.
Trust no one.
2007-03-31 08:17:51 · answer #9 · answered by George D 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Either that or they believe everything they read on the Internet.
2007-03-31 08:15:10 · answer #10 · answered by phoenix 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋