A proposal for the revised postrelocation schedule of visitation together with a proposal for the postrelocation transportation arrangements necessary to effectuate visitation with the child. Absent the existence of a current, valid order abating, terminating, or restricting visitation or other good cause predating the Notice of Intent to Relocate, failure to comply with this provision renders the Notice of Intent to Relocate legally insufficient.
2007-03-31 07:20:25 · 4 answers · asked by makdaddy743 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Post-relocation == after someone moves (relocates).
It basically says that if someone plans to move, they need to provide a proposal for what would change after the move, specifically with regard to visitation or transportation issues. And it requires a formal Notice of any planned move.
But unless the court orders a change, the person who planned to move must provide all that before the move is considered valid. Failure to provide all that means the move is in violation of the existing court order.
2007-03-31 07:26:50 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like there was a proposal for post-relocation visitation, and the lawyer representing the opposing party is responding. The opposing party's lawyer is saying that the current visitation order is in full force unless there's an order suspending or terminating it - and that the existing order must be complied with and can't be rendered unenforceable by the sending of a "Notice of Intent to Relocate." In short, according to the lawyer who wrote this, you've got to to to court before you re-locate the kiddos.
2007-03-31 14:31:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basically it means that the person who sent you this notice is dumber than our Village Idiot we have in the White House!
If you actually received this from a governmental agency I would take it down to their office and ask for an interpreter or some one to explain it to you!
This is absolutely ridiculous!
Basically it means you evidently have moved or the child has and they now want you to give them an idea of where your visitation visits will be together since the moving took effect, with what forms of transportation will be necessary to get the child to you and back.
2007-03-31 14:32:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It means your ex is taking the kid and moving out of the court's jurisdiction and you may or may not be able to visit.
2007-03-31 14:29:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋