why do they offer Hicks, who is found 'guilty' (ahem) and pleaded such, less sentence if he does not say anything about his (mis)treatment by US jailkeepers ? Clearly, they have something to hide (provided he is guilty altogether)...
2007-03-31 05:09:46 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It's part of Bush's refusal to share power, or to let anyone else outside his internal staff know what he is doing.
And since the Supreme Court has already ruled that Bush's orders for detention and tribunals were illegal (see Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 2006), Bush wants to avoid further publicity.
2007-03-31 05:14:22 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
And when he is released back to Australia, how, exactly can they keep him from talking? But hey, thanks for hating the USa so much you support captured terrorists. Thats cool, we hate you also.
2007-03-31 05:17:14 · answer #2 · answered by George D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋