Hillary: Will tell you what you want to hear and then deal with the fallout once she's President.
Obama: Wouldn't dare be running for President with his resume if he was a white guy. Two years in the Senate and a bunch of legislature time? Please.
Giuliani: If he can't keep his word to his spouse, why should we believe anything he tells US?
McCain: Who says "tar baby" and doesn't know that's racist? Please.
2007-03-31 04:46:56 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The most talked about candidates are usually the poorest choices parties can make.
Why is this? I have no idea, but every time election season comes around all we start hearing about is lackluster hypocrits who can't inspire and motivate our country with real substance and ideas.
I'm not voting for any of them. There are plenty of other candidates out there who stand up for what they believe. A whole spectrum. Take a look and decide for yourself.
2007-03-31 11:25:14 · answer #1 · answered by Frank 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
so you are looking for the perfect candidate? Has that ever happened? Doubt it, maybe Carter and look at that disaster. People make mistakes, people do dumb things. At least they are living and learning. If there is no dirt, then there probably isn't much substance either. I think Giuliani is the best candidate. He turned NY into a nice place from a total craphole. Kinda beat up on peoples rights but then the constitution was written for, of and about criminals. McCain should just give up, my god. Hellery won't get elected. We may be naive but not THAT stupid. Obama is just the token black guy on the ticket. He doesn't stand a chance either. Maybe we can talk Jeb Bush into running! LOL!!
2007-03-31 11:53:51 · answer #2 · answered by kidsRgone 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Out of the four, I'd opt for Giuliani, but that isn't saying much. A friend of mine reminded me of Giuliani's decision to cut funding from a New York art museum because he didn't like a piece (think it was the elephant dung/Virgin Mary thing). So, when I say I'd opt for him, that's only because he is the lesser of these four evils because he tends to be a moderate on many issues. Still, that's not enough for me to actually vote for him.
I don't think you should vote for any of those folks. I know that right now, there isn't a candidate for me . . . unless Jon Stewart or Lewis Black decide to run.
2007-03-31 11:52:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not try looking beyond the front runners? You don't have to vote for someone just because they happen to be the media's flavor of the week. Look at Mike Huckabee, for example. Check out his Web site and LISTEN to him on those rare moments he gets some press time. I think you may be pleasantly surprised.
2007-03-31 11:57:47 · answer #4 · answered by SA Writer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Best chance for America would be Fred Thompson. Not perfect but who is? At least I believe he would lead America in the right path.
2007-03-31 13:54:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are doomed. Wheres John Wayne?
2007-03-31 11:49:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're all lame, I think Bush is the guy we should stick with. He's a man of his word, and he does the righ thing even if it's not popular. And what's with this whole 9/11 conspiracy thing? Why would we kill our own people? I mean, COME ON AMERICA!
2007-03-31 11:53:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Good point.
How about Mitt Romney?
Was a great governer, lots of business experience, and NOT your average, sleazy politician.
2007-03-31 11:50:32 · answer #8 · answered by Skyhawk 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am hoping that Fred Thompson runs.
2007-03-31 16:05:10 · answer #9 · answered by alanknauber 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't vote for any of them. Vote for Mitt Romney.
2007-03-31 11:50:08 · answer #10 · answered by Kerry 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋