Do judges have to pass the Bar Exam if they weren't formally attorneys?

Answer 1

I think for most judgeships there is no requirement that judges have to be lawyers. Nowadays, they nearly all are but years ago it was not the case.

Answer 2

Depending on the state, judges have to go to "school" just like an attorney does. Most judges are or have been attorneys, and they know the law, and vow to uphold the law. Too bad, not too many of them keep those vows.

Answer 3

Generally, judges are required to be attorneys.

I suppose it's theoretically possible for a state to not require that as part of their qualifications, but I don't know of any states that do. Besides, how could a judge rule on matters of law (which is mainly what judges do) properly if they have not studied law.

Answer 4

I have never heard of a judge that was not formerly an attorney. I think it is a prerequisite.

Answer 5

Depends on the "kind" of judge you are talking about. Many administrative law "judges" have not attended any law school. Yet they have that title.

correct yourselves everyone

Answer 6

i could somewhat be a prosecutor. maximum people who're being tried for an alleged crime are quilty. maximum protection legal specialists presently seem to bypass out of their thank you to attempt to get a quilty individual off the hook. that's immoral, unethical, and fraudulent. now and returned prosecutors are no longer a lot extra suitable. they seem to bypass out of their thank you to convict somebody of a criminal offense even whilst the information below no circumstances helps the charges. it form of feels, nevertheless, that the prosectors are much less quilty of it than the protection criminal specialists.

Answer 7

you have to be a lawyer to be a judge.