He's gone..Let it go Libbies..
2007-03-31 04:15:10 · 12 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am not sure, but, it is obvious that many are.
For all of the Liberal Rhetoric about freedom I always thought it was kind of strange that they protested against a war of liberation and only grudgingly gave the President permission based on the fact that Saddam Hussein had WMD's that would eventually be used against the United States. "Our lives are in danger! Kill Saddam!"
Once they decided that the WMD's were not real (and the terrorists in Iraq are currently using WMD's which Liberals will not admit) the Liberals in the United States became very angry. "Our lives might not have been in danger, why should we help the Iraqi people, let them help themselves!"
Liberals sound a lot like Marie Antoinette when she said "Let them eat cake!"
I really don't understand it. "We can only help people if we are in danger, otherwise let them help themselves. But we need the government to run social services so they only help the people who are a danger to us."
Kind of weird if you ask me and I'm a centrist.
2007-03-31 04:36:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i'm a liberal. i'm additionally a veteran who served his usa honorably and could gain this returned. As a patriotic citizen of this usa i don't experience comfortable being so conceited as to anticipate that any one with the different philosophy is way less patriotic or decrease than attracted to what's ultimate for this usa. that's by no skill my place to decide all and sundry (neither is it yours for that rely) and ridiculous generalizations are in simple terms infantile and non-effective. What I do have faith is that each and all of the individuals who proceed to inspire divisiveness are posing a a procedures extra suitable threat to this usa than Saddam ought to ever wish to pose. We, as a rustic united can likely in no way be defeated from the exterior. basically a maximum cancers from interior can wreck us. people who inspire this divisiveness ignore approximately Lincoln's famous words "a house divided against itself can't stand". people who inspire this divisiveness strike a blow by contrast usa that no outdoors enemy is able to magnificent. Why do you are trying this?
2016-11-25 02:02:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would probably mourn the loss of Kim Jong Il as well...
2007-03-31 04:36:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Libs dolt bring up Saddam. Its the cons who keep bring him up to justify the war.
Let it go.
2007-03-31 04:27:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just wait untill Castro makes his final journey to the spinning nickel-iron core. They'll be brave, I'm sure, pretending they're OK. But inside...
2007-03-31 04:19:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why are neoconservatives still mourning the loss of stalin? Makes about as much sense as what you are suggesting.
2007-03-31 04:18:55 · answer #6 · answered by Firesidechat 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
They're not.
Did you conservatives know that bearing false witness against your neighbor is a sin?
2007-03-31 04:24:14 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You mean Saddam Hussein, the conservative, and his Republican Guard and Republican Palace,good riddance to bad rubbish.
2007-03-31 04:20:20 · answer #8 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
because they knew if he were still alive they could have a chance of failure in Iraq to go against bush........now they have no chance of failure in Iraq
to bad nancy, hillary and obama-bin-ladin
2007-03-31 04:27:13 · answer #9 · answered by Angus 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because he is a communist leader
thats what they want
they miss him
he was the role modle for them
2007-03-31 04:40:59 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋