He must be related to old Neville. Absolutely no .....
2007-03-31 03:06:04 · 11 answers · asked by ignuusfatuus 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Tony Blair has plenty of backbone!! You just do not go to war willy nilly. You try other avenues first. I am sure that is what he is doing, and the result will be that the British seamen will be released. If not, the Iranians will pay a dear price.
Chow!!
2007-03-31 03:44:09 · answer #1 · answered by No one 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, Blair doesn't give a crap about the British soldiers who were taken captive. It is quite possible that those soldiers were sacrificed in order to promote the desired aggression against Iran.
It's not that Blair doesn't have a backbone, rather it's that he is in agreement with the imperialist and criminal desires of the U.S. ruling elite.
As you've pointed out, this position is not very different from that of Neville Chamberlain. Contrary to the commonly advanced rhetoric, Chamberlain didn't appease Hitler at all. Chamberlain was complicit with Hitler. Hitler could have been easily crushed right up until the defeat of France. But during that time, Chamberlain and one warm and friendly meeting after another with Hitler; backing up all of his aggression. He wanted to push Hitler east to take on Russia and provide a bulwark against communism for England and western Europe. Chamberlain thought he had an agreement with Hitler. But it was a fools complicity, as Churchill was keenly aware.
Blair, on the other hand, seeks to position England's capitalist into a position to profit along side the U.S. capitalists after the military conquest of the Middle East and the institution of compradore leaders.
2007-03-31 03:15:35 · answer #2 · answered by AZ123 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darn brian caught us... we hid the backbone behind the Imperialist ruling Elite of America! Normally I see room for arguement in any situation... not this time, that was the stupidest paragraph I have ever read. Clearly Britain intentionally sent the soliders into Iranian waters in order to carry out an elaborate secret plan created by the white mason templar illuminati cult of elite republican Americans! I should have realized! (please note the hint of sarcasm)
I think he had a backbone, just there is no way Britain can just go to war with Iran over this. It would just result in losing the hostages. Britain definately should not admit to something they did not do, and Iran will eventually have to free them.
Up until this hostage thing I thought the possibility of war between the US+Britain and Iran was very slim, just lots of talk from both sides. Now it seems that Iran is doing their best to try and provoke a war.
2007-03-31 04:08:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You thick ****!!!! If he goes charging in guns a blazing then we will never see the hostages again they will die i two seconds flat Where as if they send the soldiers back in a body bags then we should nuke the fµckers
2007-03-31 03:12:46 · answer #4 · answered by Bertie D 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that is a simplistic question. What would you suggest he do? It is easy to critique when you don't have to offer a viable alternative action.
2007-03-31 03:17:42 · answer #5 · answered by slinda 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
,It was surgically removed,together with his brain, and presented to Bush
2007-04-01 02:37:57 · answer #6 · answered by I Tisi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He had it surgically removed.
2007-03-31 03:25:28 · answer #7 · answered by P. M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same place as his head, straight up his ***.
2007-03-31 03:08:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He dosen`t have one
2007-03-31 03:08:29 · answer #9 · answered by Dr Universe 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He's been 'Carterized," shall we say?
2007-03-31 03:20:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋