2007-03-31 01:59:27 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm British and fairly left of center so you can take my opinion for a grain of salt if you so wish.
I think it is absolutely disgusting that Pelosi is visiting a nation that supports Hezbollah -this is a well establish fact. Besides being a terrorist organization that is active in Israel, Hezbollah destroyed the nation of Lebanon and continues to operate there against the will of the people.
2007-03-31 02:05:09 · answer #1 · answered by Blitzhund 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
hiya Chains how approximately leaving something smart for the rest human beings to assert. easily the democrats will win the subsequent election. Al Gore has got here across himself a possible concern which will in all likelihood get him closer the White abode if no longer in it. The democrats will attain getting yet another conflict began interior the middle east and inflicting the fee of gas properly above $5 a gallon. this could in turn reason u.s. to ought to improve imaginative determination ingredients of potential (something the Dick C's of this international have stored us from doing for petty very own income) So maybe a center east conflict isn't all undesirable till it is going nuclear and the U. S. and Russia enable themselves to get into it. easily international warming will render that area of the international uninhabitable besides (it very almost already is. considered any timber interior the middle east presently) purchase that warmth pump.
2016-11-25 01:48:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nancy Pelosi and Syria have the same goals in mind in the region.
It's perfectly natural that she wants to go to Syria and unite in purpose, which means, among other things, officiating American defeat, diminishing American influence, and charting a different course than any course a Republican might set.
2007-03-31 04:12:16 · answer #3 · answered by Xenophile 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's called oversight by the leader of the Majority party. But it has more deeper meaning. Bush asks for us to accept what he says...She is checking out whether he is lying or simply stretching the truth. She needs to have a sense of Bush's mind as well as world situations. No, she does not set policy, but she can trim the fangs of a leader bent on radical military adventures. It's a fact finding mission not an Ambassadorial junket
2007-03-31 02:27:27 · answer #4 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whenever there is a void of leadership others will step up to fill the void. Folks, the Bush presidency essentially is over, and, Pelosi is wisely stepping in to fill that void.
2007-03-31 02:04:32 · answer #5 · answered by Firesidechat 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Just to give the throat cutters in dirty nighshirts a big hug
2007-03-31 02:07:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
To make Bush look bad.
That is the only thing that is concern of democrats.
2007-03-31 02:24:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Perhaps to get to the truth of matters for herself. We've had enough lies from bush & crew for long enough.
2007-03-31 02:03:03 · answer #8 · answered by steve_selke 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it should be the place of lawmakers to conduct foreign policy. That should be left to the executive branch.
2007-03-31 02:02:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
She is using her head and checking things out for her self. It is a sign of a leader.
2007-03-31 02:02:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋