2007-03-30 14:24:39 · 12 answers · asked by Torrey O 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Iran has misjudged this one, because the UN has not been unified in the past; on the security council it has always tended to align US-UK-France vs Russia-China on these matters.
The resolution passed today really surprised Iran, and unfortunately they may respond by become more hard-line.
2007-03-30 17:46:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you on Drugs? dude, we've been at war. what paisley dress did you crawl out from under?
what does Iran snatching a handful of princelovers have to do with the US?
we bailed your butts out in WW2 and you wimps haven't won a thing since then. Fight your own war, we'll help. we have a few soldiers sitting around we could let you have.
1 soldier for every 2000 you send. isn't that the ratio?
how many of you america loving Brits are fighting for us?
only the true patriots I'm afraid.
2007-03-31 03:31:52 · answer #2 · answered by Doctor Pain 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. This is a case of Britains's word against Iran's about whose waters the sailors were in, and Iran has no reason to seize sailors and lie about what waters they were in. They would surely not do something that foolish with all the attention on them already, unless their territory really were being violated. This looks like the British messing around, getting caught, and refusing to admit it, or simply trying to provoke a confrontation (They were in on the Iraq conspiracy, remember).
2007-03-30 15:50:40 · answer #3 · answered by Mackenzie G 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This gives Bush the chance to come to aid Blair. Such war will be short because it comes by air strikes. The Iranian regime is leading the Shite sect in the region who are in conflict with Sunnis. This is affecting the rise of oil prices.
2007-03-30 14:36:46 · answer #4 · answered by m b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't know about that. They gave me reason to want to go to war with them on November 4, 1979, and nothing they have done since then has changed that.
Bring it on.
2007-03-30 14:39:45 · answer #5 · answered by dBalcer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really. First, the sailors are British. Second, Bush doesn't need a reason to start a war. If there isn't a reason, he'd just make one up like he did in Iraq.
2007-03-30 14:29:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Always has been and always will be. The problem is the monkey in the White house thinking he knows the solution to
any and all problems. Haven't there been enough deaths over there already?! I say pull the soldiers out to let them settle their own differences.
2007-03-30 14:33:07 · answer #7 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I believe there is more to this than the press is saying.
2007-03-30 14:28:31 · answer #8 · answered by barthebear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All the cards have not been played yet.
2007-04-02 18:11:52 · answer #9 · answered by ringolarry 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they would have to capture our sailors for that to happen.
2007-03-30 15:29:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋