2007-03-30 14:20:34 · 18 answers · asked by FOX NEWS WATCHER 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Faux News. Yes, I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore.
2007-03-30 14:23:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
does it make you mad whilst conservatives attack the different information station with the reality? oh wait, that is purely that fox is the only diverse community so they are immediately project to scrutiny and ostracized. enable's purely forget approximately concerning the liberal bias from each little thing else... ok!
2016-12-08 14:56:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
DOES it make me mad? No. I chuckle when people attack news medias. Why don't people focus ideas and policies. Is it news that the media lies? Not at all. William Randolph Hearst had a war escalated with pen and paper, that was over a hundred years ago. Why is any media taken at face value?
2007-03-30 14:26:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
"YES, because we cannot attack non-Republicans with either facts or truth," says FOX News.
2007-03-31 10:37:20 · answer #4 · answered by Roland 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but it is frustrating when people generalize to the point of being ridiculous. Let’s look at some definitions that people are throwing around and hopefully everyone will read them.
Broadly speaking, liberalism emphasizes individual rights. It seeks a society characterized by freedom of thought for individuals, limitations on power (especially of government and religion), the rule of law, the free exchange of ideas, a market economy that supports free private enterprise, and a transparent system of government in which the rights of all citizens are protected.[2] In modern society, liberals favor a liberal democracy with open and fair elections, where all citizens have equal rights by law and an equal opportunity to succeed.[3]
Many new liberals advocate a greater degree of government influence in the free market to protect what they perceive to be natural rights, often in the form of anti-discrimination laws, universal education, and progressive taxation. This philosophy frequently extends to a belief that the government should provide for a degree of general welfare, including benefits for the unemployed, housing for the homeless, and medical care for the sick. Such publicly-funded initiatives in the market are rejected as interference by modern advocates of classical liberalism, which emphasizes free private enterprise, individual property rights and freedom of contract; classical liberals hold that economic inequality, as arising naturally from competition in the free market, does not justify the violation of private property rights.
This doesn't really sound like the classic Democrat.
How about the conservative?
Conservatism is a relativistic term used to describe political philosophies that favor traditional values, where "tradition" refers to religious, cultural, or nationally defined beliefs and customs. The term derives from the Latin, conservāre, to conserve; "to keep, guard, observe". Since different cultures have different established values, conservatives in different cultures have different goals. Some conservatives seek to preserve the status quo, while others seek to return to the values of an earlier time, the status quo ante.
Hm....I don't recognize a lot of drum beating war monger Republican in that definition, do you?
How about the neocon? Well this is a very complicated issue as it has changed in meaning since 1960's but in todays climate:
Neoconservatives also have a very strong belief in the ability of the United States to install democracy after a conflict - comparisons with denazification in Germany and installing a democratic government in Japan starting in 1945 are often made - and they have a principled belief in defending democracies against aggression. This belief has guided U.S. policy in Iraq after the removal of the Saddam Hussein regime, where the U.S. insisted on organizing elections as soon as practical
These folks really don't sound so bad either. Looks like the media (all of them, did you hear Rosie O donell on ABC the other day!) have gotten to us all.
Let's grow up shall we.
2007-03-30 14:32:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Since fox lets both sides have their say, the libs do their best on it and fail.
I hate to say it but libs are seldom right when it comes to anything. And the only time they look at the facts is if it can be twisted to show they are right.
2007-03-30 14:39:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, because I've never heard them attack it with the truth.
2007-03-30 14:24:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nah. It makes me laugh that you're so obsessed with Fox .
2007-03-30 14:23:42 · answer #8 · answered by tabs 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yes it makes me so angry.
Why can't they understand all we can do is watch Fox News until the war on terror is over?
Without Fox News where will go to for "fair and balanced" news coverage?
2007-03-30 14:23:43 · answer #9 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Nope.
2007-03-30 14:23:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
As a liberals, it seems conservatives have the mind of "Don't confuse me with the facts."
2007-03-30 14:24:53 · answer #11 · answered by Matthew P 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋