2007-03-30 13:41:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
If you define everything them mystery becomes invalid and the world cant discover anymore, we would cease to grow and mov forward.
2007-03-30 14:48:03 · answer #1 · answered by kissaled 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To live in total darkness and to die or to come to close to the sun and get burn instantaneously.
First of all to answer this question I will set another.
Do you think we are on such level of psychological and energetically level that we could define all?
I do not think so.
In our earthly auras we had only some powerful crystal energy creatures that gain a level needed, Christ, Buddha,......,..
They were illuminated, they died and stopped reincarnation way, they become perfection gets again one with creator they did define all..
Our souls are in perfect, young and only some of us are in higher blue energetically spheres like you, asking this hard question.
From my side of view, we are getting there, some faster some slower, some will newer reach it the have everything defined, to reach unity with creator.
Would I like to get there YES you bet I would, I am trying that is the reason I am trying to get your tricky question as well.
Conclusion. I will choose to define all things but I am mortal and imperfect, I am searching for light and I'll die trying. Is this define your question at all?
I wish you love, health and happiness.
2007-03-30 14:23:10 · answer #2 · answered by Juba 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Think about how the world would be altered if you took away any sense of direction from man. We would wonder aimlessly. No books, no buildings, no collective cooperation, no tilled fields, etc., because we could never find are way forward or back to anything we ever started or sought.
Definitions are focal points from which to stop or start. Without them there can only be chaos and eventual destruction.
2007-03-30 14:09:41 · answer #3 · answered by Sullivan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that everyone is a two-face character from Batman regarding our personality. I think we choose some things to stay novel in our lives and other things we put emphasis on understanding. Y is beyond me but it seems that way to me. Like in hs I never liked Literature but now in college I love it. I chose to remain ignorant of it.
2007-03-30 15:00:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I define what I can but leave the period off at the end of the sentence, just in case :)
2007-03-30 14:58:30 · answer #5 · answered by arewethereyet 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe there's quite a lot of wisdom in leaving things as in rather than defining them, in which a case they could be more or less than you perceive.
2007-03-30 13:49:04 · answer #6 · answered by Answerer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I knew what everything was =no need to define.
2007-03-30 13:54:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are going to discuss them, you must define them to prevent apples and oranges from getting mixed together.
2007-03-30 16:11:18 · answer #8 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would choose to keep everything undefined, afterall, we each have our own perceptions about things..so why stick to just one persons?
2007-03-30 13:52:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would you choose for everything in the world to be colored white or would you rather have everything colored black?
2007-03-30 14:04:42 · answer #10 · answered by Rico Toasterman JPA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋