If congressional salaries and benefits were equal to that of the average wage and benefits of those in their?

Question

districts, do you think we would have a shot at restoring honesty in government?

Answer 1

Most definitely. The other thing would be would be to pass a law, that no legislator in either state or federal government can have any retirement plan that is higher than that of the average citizen for that district. This will end politicans "free ride" of getting 100% of their pay, during retirement, and force them to receive social security, like the rest of us. It wouldn't take more than one session of congress, before SS was fixed.

Answer 2

Social protection and Medicare are no longer hand outs. human beings pay into them via payroll deductions all their working lives. Medicaid is a various deal. the day previous to this a matching article additionally sited unemployment coverage that's additionally paid into via workers and employers. those are no longer handouts. they're funded and not via the government. provide up believing each and all of the BS and do a splash diagnosis or a minimum of have some activity experience. in case you have a job examine your examine stub. in case you do no longer than take a hike or a minimum of provide up being ignorant. As you will discover i'm a Democrat and did no longer refuse to study. however the article is ninety% fake and basically proves which you and Cafferty haven't any theory what entitlements are. you have made your self appear like a moron and Cafferty is in all likelihood guffawing at you.

Answer 3

No. I think we'd have to start drafting replacement politicians to restore honesty. Thier high salary dosent seem to be enough at is is, considering some of the things a lot of them get caught up in.

What kind of a person would want that much power and responsibility? You have to be wealthy already to run a campaign. Im sure evil, wealthy people must be very attracted to this profession. We would have to start assigning average people to become politicians against their will, regular people will crack under the scrutiny, they dont have so much practice hiding their agendas.

Answer 4

Term limits. One in the Senate, two in the House. No big retirement. When your term is up here's a check for 50k thank you for your service. No public office for 10 years. Ted Kennedy was in the Senate and voted against the troops in Viet Nam that led to the deaths of millions in Laos, Cambodia and Viet Nam. He's still here and going to do it again. They vote themselves a $5000 a year pay raise.

Answer 5

I don't know. Wouldn't that lead to an average person being there, rather than someone with real talent?

I do appreciate the honesty part, but would we get the most eager or best people doing the job?

Answer 6

The opposite would happen I believe.The best and brightest and that's who you should want as your elected officials would all choose for the private sector where people with their abilities and degrees can make much more as it is already than in public service.
It's funny that the idea you are suggesting is actually socialist and I'm against it

Answer 7

No because they still have all the other perks and ways around the laws. There are still lobbyists giving them the moon.

Anyone who is narcissistic enough to run for office wouldn't settle for a "no frills" job.

Answer 8

Wishful thinking, but then you wouldn't have anyone running for public office.

Why do you think that 99% of the US Senators are millionaires.

Answer 9

The president gets $100,000 a yr....

They own companies and stocks.

Answer 10

No they would be even more susceptible to bribes and graft. Nobody decent would even run,