English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Back in Iraq, the Dems’ “Contract With al Qaeda” undercuts the progress our troops have been making since the arrival of Gen. David Petraeus (the Dems tossed him the keys to the car, but won’t give him money for gas). For all too many politicians, our 2008 elections are more important than the fate of our soldiers or the Iraqi people.

They’re doing all they can to guarantee failure. After a year of tragic setbacks, our new tactics in Iraq have brought real signs of progress. Ultimately, of course, that progress may come to nothing. Sunni assassins may succeed in reinvigorating the religious war with the Shia - who’ve behaved with restraint for the past few months.

Success is never guaranteed in any war.

But that’s no reason to guarantee failure. Threatening to cut off funding for our troops is simply despicable.

The Republicans in this administration made unforgivable mistakes in the Middle East.

Now the Democrats appear determined to do even graver damage. And they utterly refuse to consider the consequences of their actions.

The Pelosi-Murtha Democrats won’t even confront the likely results within Iraq if we quit prematurely. As for considering the effect their duplicitous bills and votes have on the calculations of bad actors elsewhere in the Middle East, the Dems just shut their eyes and cover their ears.

We’re in an appalling position where our enemies in Tehran, Riyadh, Khartoum and Damascus, and in al Qaeda’s compounds in Waziristan, are thinking ahead with greater clarity than our elected officials in Washington. This isn’t about politics.

It’s about the fate of hundreds of millions of human beings. It’s about our national security. It’s about the defense of civilization.

2007-03-30 13:02:29 · 10 answers · asked by GREAT_AMERICAN 1 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

plain and simple I want our troops OUT OF GEORGE BUSHS WAR. Democrats are working to bring them home and thats why they are the majority.

2007-03-30 13:10:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

You accept simplistic solutions to complex issues. The Sunnis and the Shiites have been fighting for hundreds of years. How will the United States bring them together while preventing other Arab nations (Iran, Syria, Sudan) as well as Al Qaeda from continuing to destabilize the region whether US troops remain in Iraq or leave? How will you change the culture of the Middle East who teach their children from a very young age that the USA is the Great Satan and they should hate and kill Americans? How do you change Americans attitudes about Arabs? The solution is not as simple as the politicians want you to believe. We can not simply "KILL" every Arab that we see and think we are winning the war on terrorism. Think outside of the box, and do not let the politicians B.S. you!

2007-03-30 13:15:59 · answer #2 · answered by Tom B 3 · 3 1

Iraq must save Iraq. Iraq's government is moving on their political agenda much more quickly now due to both the surge in troops and the threat of the redeployment of U.S. troops witnin a year.

These two agendas are very divisive in the U.S., but in Iraq I believe together they are the catalyst for them to get it together asap. I hope both the president and congress both keep up exactly what they're doing for as long as possible. You're apt to see some progress in Iraq pretty quickly.

2007-03-30 13:50:02 · answer #3 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 1 0

What progress can you site? And you're blowing smoke with that stuff about the defense of civilization and the fate of hundreds of millions of people. That's overblown scare rhetoric just like what Bush and Co. used to get us into the war in the first place.

2007-03-30 13:14:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

JFK is merely remembered fondly because he became assassinated. convinced he did a masterful interest in the course of the Cuban missile disaster, yet had his rules performed out lower than him and in no way LBJ it should be JFK remembered for Vietnam on the grounds that he despatched our troops there first earlier the LBJ presidency. the fact behind JFK's assassination is that it turned right into a mob hit. A reporter following up on a properly-known mob hitman named "David" instructed him the tale. The FBI also did a chain of tapes of the recent Orleans' mob boss Carlos "The Little guy" Marcello the position he instructed yet another inmate how he became behind the JFK assassination and how they used Oswald. The Mafia became indignant at Robert Kennedy the AG who became pursuing the Mob with vigour. They deemed removing the right became the merely became to provide up Robert Kennedy. Oswald became as he suggested - a patsy. He became recruited lower than a "pretend flag" operation. He theory he became area of a specialist Castro team and became educated so. the easily shooters were 3 out of Marsay, France. They envisioned that Oswald should be killed as they made their getaways. Oswald became no longer the merely shooter in the e book depository, notwithstanding the shot which made the right pass decrease back and to the left got here from the 2d shooter in the line drain and a third became in the element of the grassy mole. at the same time as Oswald became taken alive they had to call in a choose from Ruby a properly-known mobster who were stuck stealing from them. Ruby took out Oswald to provide up him from revealing the more advantageous plot. -the authorities participated by technique of masking up the conspiracy because they feared the spark of war with the Soviets. They theory Oswald became area of a Soviet or Cuban hit squad and if the customary public knew this they could call for justice ensuing in war. on the instant you'd be called loopy for believing your man or woman eyes and customary comprehend-how of physics.

2016-12-03 01:17:33 · answer #5 · answered by niesporek 4 · 0 0

I seriously question the intelligence of one who compares Democrats with a terrorist organization.

That is highly pathetic and just goes to show the level to which the right will sink to discredit policies that do not fall in line with theirs.

I can not believe you people have the nerve to call yourselves patriotic citizens.

2007-03-30 13:06:48 · answer #6 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 6 1

Wow. Another "zero-exit strategy" war supporter!

Didn't think you guys still existed after the mid-terms!

Must be a summer thing.

2007-03-30 14:43:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

can you maybe boil it down to one point instead of 50?

... or do you want us to just ramble on in a response that you won't even bother to read, much as I stopped bothering to read your's, as IT SAYS THE SAME CLICHE THING THAT EVERY CONSERVATIVE POST STATES... complete with no attribution to any facts listed besides "common sense"... which means "I don't have any facts" in Republicanese...

and most have looked at the "results"... they just aren't the same results that you see... there is more than one outcome to a given situation.... why do Republicans cover their eyes to that idea?

2007-03-30 13:15:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Imbecilic screed. Make things up and pass it off as fact? Nuh-uh.

2007-03-30 13:10:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think you need to check your facts and you misrepresent reality. That's OK, most of you do!

2007-03-30 13:08:39 · answer #10 · answered by cantcu 7 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers